Prayers

For “unless there is a moral revival in our Western world (especially) a rebirth of family life, Communism may be the instrument for the liquidation of a bourgeois civilization that has forgotten God . . . Communism is not to be feared just because it is anti-God, but because we are Godless; not because it is strong but because we are weak, for if we are under God, then who can conquer us?” — Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen

Monthly Archives: November 2009

FR. JOHN CORAPI: From Thanksgiving to Christmas

As we approach the United States’ traditional holiday of Thanksgiving, moving toward the Christian, and very American, celebration of Christmas, I am seeing more uncertainty, sadness, and fear than I can recall previously in my own lifetime. I have to admit I experience these things myself. Many good people might think that I should be above and beyond such emotions. Perhaps, but we are all human, and for better or for worse we all experience emotions of different types and degrees.

With unemployment somewhere between 10-15% in the United States at the present time, depending upon which region of the country you reside in, one can understand the uncertainty, the sadness, and the fear. My Grandmother used to say, “the more things change, the more they stay the same.” She had lived through the Great Depression, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and the Viet Nam war. She could tell you stories about days that were not so prosperous, not so happy, not so totally filled with hope. Yet, the sun always eventually came out again.

Marion Bay Sunrise by Mowling.

Jesus often said things like “Fear is useless. What is needed is trust;” and “Let your hearts not be troubled..;” etc. We would do well to remember this at a time when it is often not easy to be certain, happy, and without anxiety and fear. I have recently lost my closest ally and co-worker in the history of my ministry. My God-daughter Tamra traveled well over a million miles with me, worked very hard, and enabled more than 300 events, often the only person working in my office and assisting me. Her husband Matt is mostly responsible for all of the videography and technological growth we have enjoyed. They are moving on to other things, and although my heart is broken at the loss, I can only wish them every blessing for the future. Their hard work and talent blessed millions of souls through the years. Sometimes it is brutally hard to go on, for all of us. Yet, time will go on with us or without us.

Change can be traumatic. Often the older you are, the harder it is to endure change. I am not good at it, I must admit. Look at what has happened to the United States in our lifetime. If you think the trend is positive, we’re on a far different page. Seemingly caught in a fog of indecision, poor leadership, and rapidly evaporating wealth, America is dying. The cause is moral, not economic. If we end up with the curse of socialism, know very well that it was because we refused to “repent and believe the Good News, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.”

Like so many other small businesses, our sales are at an all-time low, and although we are not a charity, many charities are about to wither up and die because support for them has likewise withered up and nearly died. Yet, what can good people do? They have to feed, clothe, and house their children and themselves before they can do anything else. Resources are shrinking. Needs are relentlessly constant….

…Hope is the key word in this little note to you. As the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches in paragraph #1817:

“Hope is the theological virtue by which we desire the kingdom of heaven and eternal life as our happiness, placing our trust in Christ’s promises and relying not on our own strength, but on the help of the grace of the Holy Spirit.” “Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful.” (Hebrews 10:23).

God bless you always,

Fr. John Corapi

Jesus I Trust In You by dafna talmon.

SOURCE:  http://www.fathercorapi.com/Webpage.aspx?WebpageId=31&CategoryId=25&utm_source=email_marketing_system&utm_medium=email&utm_content=7417001&utm_campaign=Father%20Corapi%20Newsletter%20-%20From%20Thanksgiving%20to%20Christmas%3A%20A%20Message%20of%20Hope

Bill O’Reilly Interviews Rhode Island Bishop Thomas J. Tobin

Bishop Tobin to Congressman Patrick Kennedy: ‘What does it mean to be a Catholic?’

Rep. Patrick Kennedy / Bishop Thomas Tobin


WASHINGTON, D.C. (Catholic Online) – Among those Catholics in public life who openly defy the clear teaching of the Catholic Church concerning the inviolable dignity of every human life from conception to natural death is Representative Patrick Kennedy. The son of the late Senator Edward “Ted” Kennedy, he represents Rhode Island’s First Congressional District in the United States House of Representatives. The Congressman was to have had a meeting with his Bishop Thomas J. Tobin concerning his very public defiance on this matter, but that meeting has now been postponed at Kennedy’s request.

We bring to our readers the full text of a letter which Congressman Kennedy received from his Bishop, Thomas J. Tobin. This letter was in response to Kennedy’s public defiance against the truth revealed in the Natural Law, confirmed by science, affirmed in Scripture and the Tradition and taught infallibly by the Magisterium (teaching office) of the Catholic Church concerning the fundamental Human Right to Life. This matter recently surfaced when Kennedy publicly contended with the Church over the US Bishops’ heroic insistence that the proposed “Health Care Reform” which recently cleared the House not provide funding for abortion.

It passed only after the Pro-Life Amendment named after a faithful Catholic Democrat, Bart Stupak, corrected the lethal nature of its impact on our youngest neighbors in the womb. Kennedy and other Catholics such as Speaker Pelosi had simply lied when they said the legislation, prior to this essential Amendment, would not have had the effect of funding the killing of children in the womb with our tax dollars. The battle on this front is far from over.

As Catholics called to stand in solidarity with all the poor, including those whom Mother Teresa called the “poorest of the poor”, our youngest neighbors, we have had to contend with the lies of these Catholics for far too long. Patrick Kennedy is only one of too many. Kennedy told reporters on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 that he has postponed the meeting with his Bishop. He indicated he finds it “very disconcerting” that Bishop Tobin will not keep the content of their discussion “private”. This is, of course, one of the great subterfuges used by Catholics like Congressman Kennedy and others who openly defy the Church, cause scandal and confuse many in their perfidy.

What is different in this instance is the clear, courageous and commendable response of his Bishop, Thomas J. Tobin. He is using this as an opportunity to not only assist the Congressman by exposing his dangerous error and thereby assisting him to embrace the truth, but he is using it as an opportunity to stop this subterfuge before it continues to lead others astray.

He published his letter to the Congressman in the ”Rhode Island Catholic” in his regular column entitled “Without a Doubt” which can be found on the website of the “Rhode Island Catholic” at http://www.thericatholic.com/opinion/detail.html?sub_id=2632

******

Dear Congressman Kennedy

BY BISHOP THOMAS J. TOBIN

Since our recent correspondence has been rather public, I hope you don’t mind if I share a few reflections about your practice of the faith in this public forum. I usually wouldn’t do that – that is speak about someone’s faith in a public setting – but in our well-documented exchange of letters about health care and abortion, it has emerged as an issue. I also share these words publicly with the thought that they might be instructive to other Catholics, including those in prominent positions of leadership.

For the moment I’d like to set aside the discussion of health care reform, as important and relevant as it is, and focus on one statement contained in your letter of October 29, 2009, in which you write, “The fact that I disagree with the hierarchy on some issues does not make me any less of a Catholic.” That sentence certainly caught my attention and deserves a public response, lest it go unchallenged and lead others to believe it’s true. And it raises an important question: What does it mean to be a Catholic?

“The fact that I disagree with the hierarchy on some issues does not make me any less of a Catholic.”

Well, in fact, Congressman, in a way it does. Although I wouldn’t choose those particular words, when someone rejects the teachings of the Church, especially on a grave matter, a life-and-death issue like abortion, it certainly does diminish their ecclesial communion, their unity with the Church. This principle is based on the Sacred Scripture and Tradition of the Church and is made more explicit in recent documents.

For example, the “Code of Canon Law” says, “Lay persons are bound by an obligation and possess the right to acquire a knowledge of Christian doctrine adapted to their capacity and condition so that they can live in accord with that doctrine.” (Canon 229, #1)

The “Catechism of the Catholic Church” says this: “Mindful of Christ’s words to his apostles, ‘He who hears you, hears me,’ the faithful receive with docility the teaching and directives that their pastors give them in different forms.” (#87)

Or consider this statement of the Church: “It would be a mistake to confuse the proper autonomy exercised by Catholics in political life with the claim of a principle that prescinds from the moral and social teaching of the Church.” (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 2002)

There’s lots of canonical and theological verbiage there, Congressman, but what it means is that if you don’t accept the teachings of the Church your communion with the Church is flawed, or in your own words, makes you “less of a Catholic.”

But let’s get down to a more practical question; let’s approach it this way: What does it mean, really, to be a Catholic? After all, being a Catholic has to mean something, right?

Well, in simple terms – and here I refer only to those more visible, structural elements of Church membership – being a Catholic means that you’re part of a faith community that possesses a clearly defined authority and doctrine, obligations and expectations. It means that you believe and accept the teachings of the Church, especially on essential matters of faith and morals; that you belong to a local Catholic community, a parish; that you attend Mass on Sundays and receive the sacraments regularly; that you support the Church, personally, publicly, spiritually and financially.

Congressman, I’m not sure whether or not you fulfill the basic requirements of being a Catholic, so let me ask:

 

  • Do you accept the teachings of the Church on essential matters of faith and morals, including our stance on abortion?
  • Do you belong to a local Catholic community, a parish?
  • Do you attend Mass on Sundays and receive the sacraments regularly?
  • Do you support the Church, personally, publicly, spiritually and financially?

In your letter you say that you “embrace your faith.” Terrific. But if you don’t fulfill the basic requirements of membership, what is it exactly that makes you a Catholic? Your baptism as an infant? Your family ties? Your cultural heritage?

Your letter also says that your faith “acknowledges the existence of an imperfect humanity.” Absolutely true. But in confronting your rejection of the Church’s teaching, we’re not dealing just with “an imperfect humanity” – as we do when we wrestle with sins such as anger, pride, greed, impurity or dishonesty. We all struggle with those things, and often fail.

Your rejection of the Church’s teaching on abortion falls into a different category – it’s a deliberate and obstinate act of the will; a conscious decision that you’ve re-affirmed on many occasions. Sorry, you can’t chalk it up to an “imperfect humanity.” Your position is unacceptable to the Church and scandalous to many of our members. It absolutely diminishes your communion with the Church.

Congressman Kennedy, I write these words not to embarrass you or to judge the state of your conscience or soul. That’s ultimately between you and God. But your description of your relationship with the Church is now a matter of public record, and it needs to be challenged. I invite you, as your bishop and brother in Christ, to enter into a sincere process of discernment, conversion and repentance.

It’s not too late for you to repair your relationship with the Church, redeem your public image, and emerge as an authentic “profile in courage,” especially by defending the sanctity of human life for all people, including unborn children. And if I can ever be of assistance as you travel the road of faith, I would be honored and happy to do so.

Sincerely yours,

Thomas J. Tobin, Bishop of Providence

******

We thank Bishop Thomas Tobin for his clarity, courage and the genuine pastoral concern shown toward Congressman Kennedy. We also thank the Bishop for his uncompromising defense of those whose lives are threatened by the continued rebellion of too many Catholics in public life who openly reject the truth,confusing many in the process and causing serious scandal.

We ask our readers to pray that Congressman Kennedy would prayerfully receive this loving and needed correction and then reschedule his meeting with this good Shepherd. We also ask our readers to increase their prayer for all of our Bishops as they continue to contend for the truth about life and pastor the flock of God entrusted to them.

http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=34816

Catholic Bishops: Senate Health Care Bill ‘Fundamentally Flawed’

….To say that people, by law, have to pay for other peoples’ abortions would be a fundamental failure…..

Catholic News Agency, 11/25/2009

WASHINGTON, D.C. (CNA) – In a teleconference Monday afternoon, representatives of the USCCB reiterated that the current Senate health care bill needs “substantial improvement” before it can be considered anything but morally unacceptable for Catholics.

Present at the teleconference were John Carr, Executive Director of the USCCB’s Department of Justice, Peace and Human Development; Kevin Applby, Director of the Office of Migration Policy and Public Affairs; Kathy Saile, Director of the Office of Domestic Policy; and Richard Doerflinger, Associate Director of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat of Pro-Life Activities.

The spokesmen for the USCCB noted that the Senate’s version of the health care bill falls short in three regards: abortion funding and conscience protection, immigrants rights in regards to health care, and accessibility and affordability. Continue reading

Support for Obama & Democrat Health Care Plan Sink to New Low: Rasmussen

By Kathleen Gilbert, November 24, 2009, LifeSiteNews.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A Rasmussen poll released Monday revealed support for President Obama’s health care overhaul at an all-time low, with only 38% of respondents favoring the Democrats’ plan, and 56% opposed. 

The health care numbers were the lowest of the nearly two dozen Rasmussen tracking polls conducted since June, which had not dipped below 41% support.  Rasmussen also reports that the survey, which was ongoing during Saturday’s procedural vote on the measure in the Senate, showed a slight decrease in support following the vote. Continue reading

Democrats Looking for a Showdown With the Bishops

….Matthews’ behavior is just the worst of what is being directed toward Tobin and the bishops in general by the mainstream media . . . Dr. Deal Hudson: ‘I’m sure Bishop Tobin isn’t the least bit intimidated by what happened on Hardball….

By Deal W. Hudson, Ph.D., Inside Catholic, 11/25/2009

WASHINGTON, D.C. (Inside Catholic) – From all the various attacks on the Catholic bishops in the past week, including the startling outburst of irrationality from Chris Matthews, I have come to the conclusion the Democrats are itching for a showdown.
http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=34914

Readers should take a look at Bill Donohue’s take on the Matthews “interview” with Bishop Tobin. I especially like this comment:

“No non-Catholic would ever treat a bishop this way. But too many liberal Catholics, especially Irish Catholics, think they are exempt from the same standards of civility that apply to others. They are flatly wrong.”

Matthews’ behavior is just the worst of what is being directed toward Tobin and the bishops in general by the mainstream media.

This concerted attack leads me to view the decision of Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-RI) to reveal the request from Bishop Tobin that he not present himself for communion as calculated and premeditated, rather than spontaneous, as I first thought.

As I explained to Dylan Ratigan on his MSNBC show yesterday, the bishops are huge supporters of the public option aspect of the health care bill, a fact which is being overlooked in the liberal protest against their refusal to acquiese on abortion funding.

The viciousness and pervasiveness of the attack on the Catholic bishops, who are usually looked upon as allies by the political left — think of immigration and the Iraq War, to take two recent issues — demonstrates, once again, how much abortion advocacy is a first principle of most leftwing thinking.

I’m sure Bishop Tobin isn’t the least bit intimidated by what happened on “Hardball.” He is asking himself why he went on the show in the first place, especially if someone on his staff told him it was a good idea.

Why all the Fear? 11-23

Why are so many bishops so hesitant to just say it like it is?

Founder’s Quote Daily

Founder's Quote Daily

“It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage, and such only, as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent both in order of time and degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society. Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the Universe.”

–James Madison, A Memorial and Remonstrance, 1785

http://patriotpost.us/

Catholic News Roundup 11-23

Today’s stories:

Bishop vs. Politician;

 Manhattan Declaration causes waves;

Obama’s Abortion Double-cross;

Anglican’s head challenges Pope;

New Shroud of Turin research

Read the Manhattan Declaration and sign on to it

Bishop Bruskewitz on CCHD: Bishop Morin Was a “Bit Too Dismissive” of Concerns

By Patrick B. Craine, November 24, 2009, LifeSiteNews.com

LINCOLN, NebraskaBishop Fabian Bruskewitz of Lincoln, Nebraska explained in an interview with LifeSiteNews.com today his reasons for dropping the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) collection in his diocese, saying that CCHD head Bishop Roger Morin was “a little bit too dismissive” of concerns brought against the organization.

Bishop Bruskewitz is one of four bishops confirmed so far to have chosen not to take up the collection this year for the national CCHD, the USCCB’s domestic anti-poverty arm.

“We question the ideology of [CCHD],” the bishop explained in the interview, “and … we are shocked at the scandalous participation with the ACORN organization and also the participation with other organizations of questionable moral values or standards.”

The organization came under fire in the months leading up to this past weekend’s national collection due to reports documenting how numerous grantees have promoted or are promoting activities contrary to Church teaching, including abortion, contraception, and same-sex “marriage.” In fact, the Reform CCHD Now coalition announced last week that $1.3 million is allocated to questionable groups.  Additionally, critics have charged CCHD with favoring “left-leaning” groups in the spirit of infamous community organizer Saul Alinksy.

CCHD ceased funding ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), a liberal network of community activism groups, last year due to concerns about “financial management” and “political partisanship.”  CCHD had given ACORN over $7 million in grants during the previous ten years.  ACORN came under renewed scrutiny this year after sting operations caught several ACORN offices condoning child prostitution and sex trafficking. 

“It’s so extremely controversial,” the bishop said about CCHD.  There have been “many negative resonances about it from people throughout the diocese and beyond the diocese,” he said, adding that the “controversial character made it appear that [CCHD] was not effective” in meeting its purposes.

His diocese doesn’t “rule [CCHD] out entirely,” he said, but he would only reconsider the collection if there were “some changes in the organization itself, or its purposes, or its goals.”

The collection “served very little purpose for us,” he said, noting that the Lincoln diocese has not received funds from CCHD.  “We do have a very extensive Catholic Social Services, St. Vincent de Paul activity here in the diocese,” he said, “which supplies the needs of those who are impoverished, of those who need assistance to come out of poverty.”

Bishop Roger Morin, chairman of the USCCB’s subcommittee on the CCHD, delivered a passionate plea in defense of the organization at last week’s USCCB plenary meeting.  While pledging their commitment to ensure grantees’ respect for Catholic teaching, he decried the “outrageous” allegations made by CCHD’s critics that it funds pro-abortion or anti-family organizations.

But Bishop Bruskewitz expressed displeasure with Bishop Morin’s report, saying the bishop did not adequately consider the criticisms brought against the CCHD.

“I didn’t think [the report] took into account sufficiently the negatives that have been bantered about with regard to the organization,” he said.  He said Bishop Morin was “obviously defending the organization he had been involved in different areas,” and now for which he’s the chairman.

The report, further, “lacked some of the interests” that concerned people “have brought to the fore,” he said.  “I think he was perhaps a little bit too dismissive of them.”

Nevertheless, he maintained that he has “no objection” to people supporting CCHD should they choose.  If “people [who] like this organization … want to send money to it, even from my diocese, they can,” he said.  “But I’m not going to take up the collection.”
See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

Four US Bishops Did Not Take up Collection for Embattled CCHD
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/nov/09112305.html

$1.3 Million in CCHD Funds Going to Questionable Groups: Reform Coalition
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/nov/09112306.html

SOURCE: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/nov/09112410.html

GOSPEL & MEDITATION: Costly Catholicism

Father Edward McIlmail, LC

Luke 21:12-19Jesus said to his disciples: “Before all this happens, however, they will seize and persecute you, they will hand you over to the synagogues and to prisons, and they will have you led before kings and governors because of my name. It will lead to your giving testimony. Remember, you are not to prepare your defense beforehand, for I myself shall give you a wisdom in speaking that all your adversaries will be powerless to resist or refute. You will even be handed over by parents, brothers, relatives, and friends, and they will put some of you to death. You will be hated by all because of my name, but not a hair on your head will be destroyed. By your perseverance you will secure your lives.”

 

Introductory Prayer: Jesus my Savior, thank you for another day and another chance to grow in holiness with your grace. I love you and wish to make you the true center of my thoughts, desires and actions.

Petition: Lord, help me face the difficulties of practicing my faith day-to-day.

1. Persecution Opposition from the world is the price we pay for following Christ. No pain, no gain. Why should that surprise us? If living the Gospel were easy, all the world would be saints. But the Gospel is demanding. It rubs against our fallen human nature. It demands of us — and even makes us unpopular. Why? Because people who do good are a thorny reminder to those who don´t. It shouldn´t surprise us that the neighbors look down on us for having so many kids. Or that the guys in the dorm snicker at us for living chastely. Or that the boss overlooks us for a promotion because we wouldn´t donate to that pro-abortion group last Christmas during the company fund drive. Do I realize that to be a Christian is to be persecuted?

2. No Defense When Christ tells us not to prepare our defense he´s not telling us to sit back and do nothing. Rather, he wants us to use our talents for the Kingdom. Christ is inviting us to trust that ultimately the victory of good over evil belongs to him. God has his time and place for everything. In the meantime we are called to build the Kingdom wherever we can — in our families, our offices, our schools, our communities. How am I building the Kingdom in the areas around me?

3. Wisdom from Above “I myself shall give you a wisdom in speaking .…” When we stay close to Christ in prayer and deed, he takes over our lives little by little. And that´s good. Our selfishness fades. Our heart grows. We die to ourselves. “He must increase; I must decrease” (John 3:30). But we have to ask ourselves: Do we really<i/> believe in the Gospel? Do we believe in it enough to use Christ´s words when we have to respond to the nonbelievers around us? How often do we identify ourselves as Catholic in public?

Conversation with Christ: Lord, you know it´s not easy to be seen as your friend. People laugh at us — if they don´t feel sorry for us. They don´t understand where we are coming from. Help me understand some of the loneliness you must have felt when you went against the world´s standards. Help me be faithful to you regardless of the cost.

Resolution: In conversation or in an e-mail I will use a line of Christ’s wisdom from the Gospel.http://www.regnumchristi.org/english/articulos/articulo.phtml?se=363&ca=975&te=735&id=20302

ST. CATHERINE OF ALEXANDRIA

CATHOLIC NEWS, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009

 Catherine was born into a noble family and received a good education, especially in the sciences. When she was only eighteen years old, she  presented herself to the Emperor Maximinus, who was violently persecuting the Christians, where she upbraided him for his cruelty and attempted to prove how sinful and wrong was the worship of false gods.
 
Astounded at the young girl’s audacity, but incapable to challenge her arguments, the emperor detained her in his palace and summoned numerous scholars whom he commanded to use all their skill in debate and rhetoric in order to get Catherine to apostatize. However, the young Catherine emerged from the debate victorious. Several of her adversaries, conquered by her eloquence, declared themselves Christians and were at once put to death.
Furious at having his plans foiled, Maximinus had Catherine scourged and then imprisoned. Meanwhile the empress, eager to see so extraordinary a young woman, went with Porphyry, the head of the soldiers, to visit her in the dungeon. They too were convinced by Catherine’s arguments, believed, were baptized, and immediately were martyred.

Soon afterward, the young saint, who had not forsaken her faith but rather, made many converts, was condemned to die on a spiked wheel. At her touch, the instrument of torture was miraculously destroyed. The emperor, enraged beyond control, then had her beheaded and angels carried her body to Mount Sinai. A church and monastery were later built in her honor on Mount Sinai, which are still in use today.

Her intercession is implored by theologians, apologists, pulpit orators, and philosophers. Before studying, writing, or preaching, they beseech her to illumine their minds, guide their pens, and impart eloquence to their words.

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/saint.php?n=398

TUESDAY, NOV. 24, 2009

Former Obama Organizer Starts Web Site to Target Homosexual Priests to ‘Encourage’ Them to Repudiate Catholic Moral Stand on Homosexuality–Or ‘Out’ Them

By Matt Cover, Staff Writer, CNSNews, November 24, 2009
 

 


FILE- Archbishop of Washington Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl walks with United States Chief Justice John Roberts after the Red Mass at Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle, in Washington, Sunday, Oct. 4, 2009. (AP photo)
 
(CNSNews.com) – A longtime Washington, D.C., liberal Internet activist has founded a Web site that he says will collect accounts of homosexuals in the Catholic priesthood–accounts he will use to “encourage” them to change their views on homosexual marriage and other issues.

“Outing” the priests–publicly revealing their homosexuality–is “not off the table,” Phil Attey, founder of the Web site ChurchOuting.com, told CNSNews.com. The site will also collect information on straight priests who have broken their vow of celibacy, using the information to “encourage” those priests to go against their Church’s teachings on homosexuality as well.

“This is a campaign to collect information about closeted gay Catholic priests, as well as heterosexual Catholic priests who secretly engage in romantic or sexual affairs, yet are unwilling to speak out against the church leadership’s anti-gay political campaigns,” the Web site says. 

Attey, a former Obama campaign organizer and Internet organizing pioneer, said the goal of his site was not to “out” the priests, but to end what he called the “spiritual abuse” inflicted by Catholic priests who teach against homosexual marriage and the homosexual lifestyle.

“The goal of this site is not to out priests,” Attey said. “It’s to end the cycle of spiritual abuse that has gone on for generations within the Catholic Church, demonizing what it is to be gay. Closeted gay priests spiritually abusing young gay kids and giving them the alternative of going into the clergy and into the priesthood.”

Priests who refuse to come out after being confronted may be publicly exposed, according to Attey.

“We’re not taking that option off the table,” he said.

Bill Donahue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, strongly condemned the plan.

“There’s a word for this–it’s ‘fascism.’ They’re just out to publicly destroy people,” Donahue told CNSNews.com.

“Are they going to start harassing, intimidating, stalking priests?” Donahue asked. “This is a religious cleansing; this is a witch hunt. This is simply beyond the pale.”

Focusing on Washington Archdiocese
 
Attey’s campaign is focused on the Washington, D.C., archdiocese, where Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl, who has spoken out against the D.C. City Council’s move to recognize gay marriage.

“For the archdiocese and Catholic Charities, two core tenets of our faith are at the heart of our concerns: our understanding of the nature of marriage and our commitment to expressing Christ’s love through service to others,” Wuerl wrote in a Nov. 17 Washington Post op-ed.

“Under the legislative language before the D.C. Council, the archdiocese would be forced to choose between these two principles. The archdiocese has long made clear that all people have equal dignity, regardless of sexual orientation. But marriage is reserved for husband and wife because of its essential connection with the creation of children.”

Wuerl noted that if the D.C. City Council moves to redefine marriage to include homosexuals his church may not be able to continue partnering with the city on other charitable projects, such as feeding the homeless.
 
“(T)he District requires Catholic Charities to certify its compliance with city laws when applying for contracts and grants. This includes contracts for homeless services, mental health services, foster care and more. Since Catholic Charities cannot comply with city mandates to recognize and promote same-sex marriages, the city would withhold contracts and licenses,” Wuerl explained.

According to Attey, homosexual and non-celibate heterosexual priests who support these and other positions of the Washington archdiocese are “hypocrites,” whom his Web site would work to bring out of the “closet.”
 
“The dream of this site is to collect enough stories about enough priests so that we can go to them and say ‘Listen, this Web site has collected enough stories about enough of you in the archdiocese to where the archbishop can’t seek retribution against you or retaliate against you if you all come out at once. And if you do that there aren’t going to be any stories floated about you (to media outlets.)’ ” 

After that, where a homosexual or non-celibate priest stands on gay issues is up to him, Attey explained, saying he doesn’t care so long as “everyone knows the priest is gay.”

“Where they stand on LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) issues after that is totally fine with me. If they want to be an openly-gay priest standing up as an openly-gay person standing up in front of their parish supporting whatever ideology the Catholic Church wants them to support, that’s fine.”

Attey said he will use “rigorous scrutiny” in investigating any tip he receives about a potentially gay priest, pointing out that people who wish to leave tips on his web site cannot remain anonymous and must be able to provide the names of other witnesses that can corroborate the stories.

“No report is allowed to be anonymous, they have to give us their names (and) their e-mail address at least. We send them an e-mail, if it all seems credible, and we ask them if we can speak with them about it. At which point I ask them to write it out in the form of a narrative and sign it.

“I’m specifically looking for situational or logistical information around their story: where it took place, any other individuals involved, dates, and times, so that we can start looking into (it.) After we’ve verified it through two or three different sources then I think it’s fair to say that it’s a credible story.

“No name would ever be released unless it goes through that rigorous scrutiny,” he said. 

Attey said that he will use the accounts to “encourage” gay and non-celibate priests to come out publicly and turn against the Church’s teachings on homosexuality.

“We’re going to encourage them to change,” Attey explained. “This is a much bigger issue within the Catholic Church–rectifying the hypocrisy of their stands on LGBT people, not just civil equality.”

Priests who might face public exposure, he said, would be either high profile priests or more junior clergy who were outspoken proponents of the Church’s teachings on gay issues.

Attey said that high profile priests would receive a visit first, to let them know that they were going to be exposed whether they cooperated or not.

“We’d go to him first and we’d explain to him that we’re about to do this and then we’d probably do it whether he was willing to come out on his own or not.”

Priests who strongly support the Church’s teaching may also be exposed, depending on how outspoken they are.

“It also depends upon how heavy handed the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is and a particular bishop or archbishop is on making them follow through on the agenda of the USCCB. 

“If that priest is allowing his Church to disseminate the pastoral letter condemning homosexuality again and or using their collection plate to fund anti-gay initiatives well that’s another marker–I’m not taking it off (the table.) We’re going to analyze what’s going on within that parish and the behavior of that particular priest to decide whether or not at the end if they’re not willing to come out on their own we’re going to need to intervene.”

Donahue thinks the tactic is so heinous that even some homosexual leaders probably oppose it. 

“It’s borderline blackmail, at the very least, if not rank blackmail as one could maintain,” Donahue said. “Even if one disagrees with the archbishop in Washington in terms of what he’s doing, these kinds of tactics are obviously so incredibly monstrous and odious that it would seem to beg a response from gay leaders.”

SOURCE: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/57621

Top Catholic Cardinal Says ‘No Way’ Catholic Members of Congress Can Support Senate Health Care Bill That Funds Abortion

By Karen Schuberg, CNSNews, November 24, 2009


Musician Jon Bon Jovi, right, and Cardinal Justin Rigali appear at a news conference on Wednesday, July, 8, 2009. (AP photo)

 (CNSNews.com) -  A top Roman Catholic cardinal told CNSNews.com that there is “no way” Catholic members of Congress can support the Senate health care reform bill as long as it includes a provision that allows tax dollars to go to insurance plans that cover abortion. 
 
At the National Press Club on Nov. 20, CNSNews.com asked Cardinal Justin Rigali, the archbishop of Philadelphia: “The Senate health care bill that Majority Leader Reid released this week permits tax dollars to go to insurance plans which cover abortion.  And my question is: Would it be a mortal sin for a Catholic member of Congress to vote for this bill knowing that this provision is in it?”


“Well, first of all,” Rigali responded, “the Catholic Church and, therefore, individual Catholics, are completely against abortion. So our position is that, first of all, a health care bill can be a great, great blessing to our country. The bishops of the United States have been in favor, for long years, in favor of universal, affordable health care for everyone. So this, this is something that is extremely important.
 
“But we make a distinction between health care and killing,” Rigali continued. “So abortion is out of the question–as we’ve spoken about the value of human life. And everyone is called upon to do everything possible to see that when we are trying to get laudable health care—and that’s what we hope to get—laudable health care, but certainly abortion will be excluded from that.  So we exhort everyone of good will that this is for the good of our country. This is for the good of individuals. We have to make sure that health care doesn’t end up as killing. So everyone is challenged to make his or her contribution, and we’re counting on legislators to make sure this is not part of what is going to rule the lives of people.”
 
When asked in a follow-up question whether it would be a mortal or venial sin, or not sinful at all, for a Catholic member of Congress to vote for the health care bill knowing that it would provide tax dollars to health insurance plans that cover abortion, Rigali said that people need to follow a well-formed conscience, and that a well-formed conscience would recognize that abortion is “absolutely wrong” and that there is “no way in the world” a health care bill can be supported if it includes a provision allowing tax dollars to go to abortion coverage.
 
“People have to follow their conscience, but their conscience has to be well-formed,” said Rigali. “And you have to make sure that when it is a question of doing something that has a provision, if it has a provision in it for abortion, then this is absolutely wrong by every standard and not by the standards of the Catholic Church as you see here today.  It’s the standards of Christian, standards of the natural law. 
 
“Everyone is called. Yes, no, any bill, any bill that has abortion in it is in our opinion to be rejected,” Rigali continued. “But keep in mind that health reform as such is a wonderful, wonderful thing. But a bill that includes it, there’s no way in the world that it can be supported and if it comes down to that.  Once again we have the coming down as we examined in other questions. If it comes down to that, then we would urge, urge, a rejection because health reform is necessary, it has to be reformed, and it can’t be killing.”
 
Here is a transcript of the exchange between CNSNews.com and Cardinal Justin Rigali:
 
CNSNews.com:  “The Senate health care bill that Majority Leader Reid released this week permits tax dollars to go to insurance plans which cover abortion. And my question is: would it be a mortal sin for a Catholic member of Congress to vote for this bill knowing that this provision is in it?”
 
Cardinal Rigali:  “Well, first of all, the Catholic Church and, therefore, individual Catholics, are completely against abortion. So our position is that, first of all, a health care bill can be a great, great blessing to our country. The bishops of the United States have been in favor, for long years, in favor of universal, affordable health care for everyone. So this, this is something that is extremely important.
 
“But we make a distinction between health care and killing. So abortion is out of the question, as we’ve spoken about the value of human life. And everyone is called upon to do everything possible to see that when we are trying to get laudable health care—and that’s what we hope to get—laudable health care, but certainly abortion will be excluded from that.  So we exhort everyone of good will that this is for the good of our country. This is for the good of individuals.     We have to make sure that health care doesn’t end up as killing. So everyone is challenged to make his or her contribution, and we’re counting on legislators to make sure this is not part of what is going to rule the lives of people.”
 
CNSNews.com: “All right.  So would it be a mortal sin or a venial sin or even sinful at all for a Catholic lawmaker to vote in favor of a bill that still has that provision in it that would cover abortions?”
 
Cardinal Rigali: “People have to follow their conscience, but their conscience has to be well-formed. And you have to make sure that when it is a question of doing something that has a provision, if it has a provision in it for abortion, then this is absolutely wrong by every standard and not by the standards of the Catholic Church as you see here today.  It’s the standards of Christian, standards of the natural law. 
 
“Everyone is called. Yes, no, any bill, any bill that has abortion in it is in our opinion to be rejected. But keep in mind that health reform as such is a wonderful, wonderful thing. But a bill that includes it, there’s no way in the world that it can be supported and if it comes down to that.  Once again we have the coming down as we examined in other questions. If it comes down to that, then we would urge, urge, a rejection because health reform is necessary, it has to be reformed, and it can’t be killing.”
 

 


Baby at 5 months gestation
Rigali, the archbishop of Philadelphia, is also the chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) Committee for Pro-life Activities.The USCCB, which speaks for approximately 300 active bishops in the United States and is headed by Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, has sent several letters to members of Congress urging lawmakers to bar taxpayer-funding of abortion in health-care reform bills. On July 17, for example, the USCCB sent a letter to all members of the House of Representatives and the Senate, saying, “We have in the past and we must always insist that health care reform exclude abortion coverage or any other provisions that threaten the sanctity of life… No health care reform plan should compel us or others to pay for the destruction of human life, whether through government funding or mandatory coverage of abortion.” 
 
The letter was signed by Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Centre, New York, chairman of the Domestic Justice Committee.
 
On August 11, Rigali sent congressional representatives a letter to underscore the USCCB’s July 17 letter to Congress, writing, “Much-needed reform must not become a vehicle for promoting an ‘abortion rights’ agenda or reversing longstanding policies against federal funding and mandated coverage of abortion.”
 
On Sept. 30, the USCCB called on senators to bar federal funding of abortion in health care reform, saying, “We urge you to … support a fair and just health care reform bill that excludes mandated coverage for abortion and upholds longstanding laws that restrict abortion funding and protect conscience rights.  No one should be required to pay for or participate in abortion.  It is essential to clearly include longstanding and widely supported federal restrictions on abortion funding/mandates and protections for rights of conscience.” 
 
The letter continued, “So far, the health reform bills considered in committee, including the new Senate Finance Committee bill, have not met President Obama’s challenge of barring use of federal dollars for abortion and maintaining current conscience laws.  These deficiencies must be corrected.” 
 
The Sept. 30 letter was signed by Murphy, Rigali, and Bishop John Wester of Salt Lake City, chairman of the Committee on Migration.
 
On Oct. 8, the USCCB sent a letter to members of the House of Representatives, saying, “We continue to urge you to … exclude mandated coverage for abortion, and incorporate longstanding policies against abortion funding and in favor of conscience rights.  No one should be required to pay for or participate in an abortion.  It is essential that the legislation clearly apply to this new program longstanding and widely supported federal restrictions on abortion funding and mandates, and protections for rights of conscience.”
 
The bishops added that they “will have to oppose the health care bill vigorously” if safeguards against federal funding of abortion are not realized. The letter was signed by Murphy, Rigali, and Wester.
 
On Nov. 6, the USCCB sent an urgent message to House members, imploring lawmakers to “support an amendment to keep in place current federal law on abortion funding and conscience protections and to oppose a closed rule that would prevent the House from voting on this crucial matter.” 
 
“Without such protection we will have to oppose the current legislation until this fundamental flaw is remedied,” wrote Bishops Murphy, Rigali, and Wester.
 
Pastors of all the Catholic churches across the nation also were called upon by the USCCB to do their part to resist federal funding of abortion in health-care reform.  On Oct. 29, the USCCB sent bulletin inserts to almost 19,000 parishes, the same day the House of Representatives unveiled its 1,990-page health care plan. The insert was headlined, “Tell Congress:  Remove Abortion Funding & Mandates from Needed Health Care Reform.”
 
The insert further urged parishioners to contact House members and senators to address conscience protection concerns and to “fix these bills with pro-life amendments” to ensure federal funds are not used to cover abortion through the health care bill.
 
“Health care reform should be about saving lives, not destroying them,” read the insert.
 
Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, president of the USCCB, issued a statement on Nov. 9 in which he praised and thanked the House of Representatives for passing the Stupak amendment, which bars federal money from going to elective abortions.
 
The
Stupak amendment, sponsored by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) and Rep. Joseph Pitts (R-Pa.), would prohibit federal funds from paying for any part of any health insurance plan that covers abortion. It passed in the House on a bipartisan vote of 240 to 194, after heavy lobbying by pro-lifers, including staff from the USCCB, and after Stupak and at least 40 other Democrats threatened to kill the health care bill unless allowed a vote on the amendment.
 
In passing the Stupak amendment, “the Representatives honored President Obama’s commitment to the Congress and the nation that health care reform would not become a vehicle for expanding abortion funding or mandates,” wrote Cardinal George.
 
“The Conference [USCCB] will remain vigilant and involved throughout this entire process to assure that these essential provisions are maintained and included in the final legislation,” he said.
 
At the National Press Club, Rigali spoke alongside other prominent Christian clergymen and scholars about the release of the Manhattan Declaration, a statement that proclaims the sanctity of life, traditional marriage and religious liberty. 
 
Those in attendance included Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C.; Bishop Harry Jackson, Jr. of Hope Christian Church; Prof. Robert George of Princeton University; George Weigel, distinguished senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and founding president of the James Madison Foundation; Tony Perkins, president of Family Research Council; and Jim Daly, president of Focus on the Family.

Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president of the Action Institute, which seeks to promote Judeo-Christian ideas with free market principles, attended the event at the National Press Club where CNSNews.com asked Cardinal Rigali about the sinfulness of a Catholic member of Congress voting for a health care reform bill that funds abortion. Fr. Sirico offered commentary on the cardinal’s answer.

“When you ask if something is a mortal sin or a venial sin, you’re asking a question with regard to the individual act,” said Fr. Sirico.

Fr. Sirico drew a distinction between the objective moral status of an act and the subjective moral culpability of the person who commits it.

“When we’re talking about the broad morality of the thing, we’re talking about as it exists in natural law,” he said.  Abortion and funding abortion violate the natural law and are gravely immoral. But for a person to commit a mortal sin, Sirico said, three conditions must be met: the act must be gravely wrong, the person must know it is gravely wrong, and the person must deliberately choose to do it.

“So, the reason the cardinal seemed like he wasn’t answering the question directly is because you can’t judge this along every congressperson, because it depends on their individual knowledge and their individual act of free will,” Sirico said.

“And so, it is grave, and if a person knows that it’s grave, and acts upon it freely, they may have committed a mortal sin,” he said.
 
The Catholic Catechism says: “For a sin to be mortal, three conditions must together be met: ‘Mortal sin is sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent.
Grave matter is specified by the Ten Commandments, corresponding to the answer of Jesus to the rich young man: ‘Do not kill, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and your mother. The gravity of sins is more or less great: murder is graver than theft. One must also take into account who is wronged: violence against parents is in itself graver than violence against a stranger. Mortal sin requires full knowledge and complete consent. It presupposes knowledge of the sinful character of the act, of its opposition to God’s law. It also implies a consent sufficiently deliberate to be a personal choice. Feigned ignorance and hardness of heart do not diminish, but rather increase, the voluntary character of a sin.

Unintentional ignorance can diminish or even remove the imputability of a grave offense. But no one is deemed to be ignorant of the principles of the moral law, which are written in the conscience of every man.”

 

LifeNews.com Headlines: Nov. 24, 2009

FATE OF PRO-ABORTION SENATE HEALTH CARE BILL RESTS WITH DEMOCRATS, PUBLIC OPTION
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) – Now that the Senate has approved the Motion to Proceed on its pro-abortion health care reform bill, its fate rests with Democrats who will determine whether changes will be made to the legislation and whether they like them. The only consistent pro-life Democrat has said he will vote no if abortion funding remains.


PRO-LIFE GROUPS WILL HOLD DEMOCRATS ACCOUNTABLE FOR PRO-ABORTION HEALTH CARE
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) – Pro-life organizations are disappointed by the outcome of the vote on the Motion to Proceed which saw a one-vote partisan victory to start debate on the pro-abortion health care bill. Though they worked overtime to secure no votes, they say they will continue to try to amend or defeat the legislation.


HEALTH CARE SUPPORT DROPS TO BELOW 40 PERCENT AFTER SENATE OKS PRO-ABORTION BILL

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) – The level of support for a health care bill has plummeted to below 40 percent for the first time in a new Rasmussen poll. The numbers showing health care support at its lowest levels all year come after the Senate on Saturday approved a bill that contains massive abortion funding and other pro-life concerns.


CATHOLIC BISHOP: PATRICK KENNEDY MISREPRESENTING LETTER ON COMMUNION, ABORTION

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) – Congressman Patrick Kennedy, a pro-abortion member from Rhode Island, says Bishop Thomas Tobin has asked him to stop receiving communion because of his pro-abortion views. However, Tobin says the demand was merely a voluntary request that was issued two years ago and meant to be private.


SARAH PALIN; MY LIFE WITH TRIG, OUR DOWN SYNDROME CHILD

by Sarah Palin
I see photos of Trig and can recognize the physical traits that let all Down children look like brothers and sisters, the characteristics that may puzzle some who, just like me a few months prior, don’t yet understand.
But looking at these children in real life, we see only perfection. Let’s work together to make this world a more welcoming place for everyone with special needs.


MAN IN SUPPOSED 23-YEAR-LONG COMA SPEAKS, SAYS HE WAS ALWAYS CONSCIOUS

London, England (LifeNews.com) – After he was the victim of an automobile accident, doctors said 23-year-old Rom Houben was in a comatose state and unable to communicate with those around him. Now, 23 years later, the 46-year-old says he felt trapped as he was conscious the entire time and attempted to communicate.

Opinion: Chris Matthews Should Be Fired for His Offensive Interview of Bishop Tobin

….Matthews showed how inept he is as an interviewer,
how misinformed he is as a Catholic,
how rude he is as a person and
how threatened he is by the Moral truth . . .
Matthews feigned respect by repeatedly calling the Bishop “Your Excellency”, but his manner of proceeding revealed he has no respect for the Office. Matthews, a professing Catholic, also does not understand his own faith. He does not understand that his own Church’s unwavering opposition to the taking of all innocent human life at every age and stage is the ground of every social justice issue….

By Deacon Keith Fournier, Catholic Online, 11/24/2009

Chris Matthews should be fired for his offensive and impolite Interview of Bishop Thomas Tobin. Then, he should sign up for the Right of Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA) and learn the Catholic faith all over again.
Chris Matthews should be fired for his offensive and impolite Interview of Bishop Thomas Tobin. Then, he should sign up for the Right of Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA) and learn the Catholic faith all over again.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (Catholic Online) When I discovered that Chris Matthews of the program Hardball was going to interview Bishop Thomas Tobin on the continuing saga of Congressman Patrick Kennedy, I knew I had to watch. Bishop Tobin has courageously – and with a Pastor’s heart – tried to help Congressman Patrick Kennedy to see the dangerous error of his failure to defend the fundamental Right to Life. The Congressman is one of far too many unfaithful Catholics in public life who do not demonstrate moral coherence in their exercise of public office.

After sitting through several segments, I should have known from the “tease” to the segment which I was awaiting where this arrogant, self centered commentator intended to take this alleged “interview”. He repeatedly “teased” to the segment by incessantly repeating the term “Abortion rights” and indicating that he was going to interview Bishop Tobin who was “punishing” Congressman Kennedy for supporting “abortion rights”. There are no “abortion rights”, only human rights. I cannot listen to that phrase “abortion rights” without instantly responding.

The claim of a so called “right” to abort an innocent child is heinous. It is also a fallacy to couch this evil in the language of a woman’s “Right to Choose.” Some choices are always and everywhere wrong. Yet, that is the current state of the positive law in America since the horrendous decisions in Roe and Doe. Women can “choose” to take the life of our first neighbors, the ones who live where we all once lived, in the womb. That “choice” – which is always and everywhere wrong because it is the taking of innocent human life – is also currently protected by the Police Power of the State.

Abortion is the only example of taking innocent human life which is so protected by the Police Power of the State. It has a special status as some sort of “super right” in the American libertine culture and the dictatorship of relativism. Imagine if the positive law created a so called “right” to kill three week old babies because the Supreme Court said it was OK. There is no moral difference. Abortion is feticide in a new language intended to make what is evil sound acceptable.

In an Orwellian effort to change the debate and assuage their consciences its’ advocates have fashioned a “rights language” to make it somehow sound enlightened. It does not work. Science has confirmed what our conscience long ago told all of us, the child in the womb is one of us. She is our neighbor. It is always wrong to kill an innocent neighbor. This truth is written on our hearts by the Natural Law which all just positive laws should participate in and not abrogate. Intentional abortion is wrong and should be illegal in a just society.

The notion that the act of intentionally killing of an entire class of human beings should be called an “abortion right” is despicable. Only human persons can have “rights.” Governments do not create them, they can only recognize them. The act of abortion is a heinous crime. It has no “rights.”

The shorthand phrase “abortion rights” is a linguistic tool used by some journalists like Matthews to further the abortion deception. Even if the positive law of the United States has placed the Police Power behind protecting the evil “choice” to take innocent human life in the womb, one simply cannot have a “right” to do what is always wrong.

Matthews finally did have the good Bishop on his show. It quickly became clear that he intended to pummel him, browbeat him and try to persuade him to abandon the truth and excuse the error which Matthews has embraced. In his grandiosity and arrogance Matthews proceeded to talk over the Bishop, interrupt him, cut him off, and try to lecture him in a condescending manner on “the law”. He repeatedly tried to force him to answer loaded questions. He finally had the audacity to suggest that the Bishop needed to rethink his position.

MSNBC should publicly apologize to the Bishop and Matthews should be fired for his lack of professionalism. To not give this good and intelligent man, this Bishop of the Catholic Church, an opportunity to speak, after inviting him on this show, was inexcusable.

I hope Chris Matthews is reading this article. If you are Chris, here is my heartfelt personal message to you, “You should be ashamed of yourself. You need to get right with God and with your Church”.

Matthews feigned respect by repeatedly calling the Bishop “Your Excellency”, but his manner of proceeding revealed he has no respect for the Office. Matthews, a professing Catholic, also does not understand his own faith. He does not understand that his own Church’s unwavering opposition to the taking of all innocent human life at every age and stage is the ground of every social justice issue.

At several points in this frustrating interview, as the Bishop was trying to help Matthews see that the defense of the Right to Life is a “Natural Law” position and not simply “religious”, Matthews simply cut him off and continued his ill mannered browbeating.

Yet, in spite of Matthews asinine effort to claim that morality has nothing to do with the law, the Bishop at least succeeded in showing that morality is the foundation of much of the positive law. He used a few salient examples such as our prohibiting in the law the killing our neighbor, stealing his property or beating him up. Matthews would hear none of it.

Chris Matthews was not interested in interviewing Bishop Thomas Tobin. In this embarrassing excuse for a program he showed how inept he is as an interviewer, how misinformed he is as a Catholic, how rude he is as a person and how threatened he is by the Moral truth as taught with conviction and courage by his own Church.

Chris Matthews should be fired for his offensive and impolite Interview of Bishop Thomas Tobin. Then, he should sign up for the Right of Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA) and learn the Catholic faith all over again.

http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=34908

How to Contact MSNBC News

 MSNBC News: (212) 664-4444

STUNNING! Arrogant Chris Matthews Throws a Furious Diatribe at His Excellency, Bishop Tobin

Monday, November 23, 2009Tobin Does the Thunderdome

Amid the recent escalation of his monthlong public dispute with Rhode Island Rep. Patrick Kennedy given the latter’s pro-abortion rights stance and panning of the church’s engagement in the health-care reform debate, Bishop Thomas Tobin

of Providence made his highest-profile media turn to date, appearing on MSNBC’s Hardball earlier tonight.

Be advised that, as the segment begins with a clip of the (in)famous “Houston speech”

given by the eight-term Democrat’s uncle during his historic run for the Presidency, Chris Matthews’ intended trajectory presents itself even before he starts yelling….

That said, here below, the full vid:

SOURCE:  http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/

Founder’s Quote Daily

Founder's Quote Daily

“Wish not so much to live long as to live well.”

–Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard’s Almanack, 1746

http://patriotpost.us/

Four US Bishops Did Not Take up Collection for Embattled CCHD

By Patrick B. Craine, November 23, 2009, LifeSiteNews.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. While many U.S. bishops have publicly acknowledged problems with the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD), LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) has confirmed that at least four bishops opted to not take up this year’s national collection.

A controversy has erupted in the U.S. Church in recent weeks after evidence came to light showing that numerous CCHD grantees have promoted issues and practices in violation of Catholic teaching, including abortion, contraception, and same-sex “marriage.”  In response to the revelations a coalition of Catholic organizations, the Reform CCHD Now Coalition, formed, calling for a boycott of the November 21-22 national CCHD collection.

Shortly thereafter Bishop Roger Morin, chairman of the USCCB’s subcommittee on the CCHD, delivered a passionate plea to the bishops’ plenary meeting last week, pledging the CCHD’s commitment to ensure grantees’ respect for Catholic teaching.

In his speech Morin lashed out at what he called “outrageous” allegations that the bishops’ charitable-arm funds pro-abortion and anti-family organizations ”or other untruths.” He charged that some such claims were motivated by “ideological or political agendas.” The bishop chairman of CCHD even went so far as to state, ”For these groups, this seems to be just another way to attack the Church and its shepherds.”

Nevertheless, at least four bishops will not contribute to the national CCHD fund this year: Bishop John O. Barres of Allentown, Pennsylvania; Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz of Lincoln, Nebraska; Bishop Robert C. Morlino of Madison, Wisconsin; and Bishop Robert J. Baker of Birmingham, Alabama.

Bishop Barres has suspended the collection for this year, though he may continue it in future years, said diocesan communications director Matthew Kerr in an interview with LSN.  Kerr said that Bishop Barres gave no reason for the suspension and also that, as a new bishop, he is “reviewing a lot of things.”

Further, Bishop Bruskewitz has chosen not to take part in the CCHD collection, says diocesan chancellor Fr. Daniel Rayer.  It had normally been included in a combined collection, he said, but they have now dropped it for the first time.  Bishop Bruskewitz was not available to comment further today.

As he did last year, Bishop Morlino chose to allocate the national campaign’s portion of the collection to a different cause.  Last year, the funds were sent to the Hurricane Ike recovery fund, and this year he allocated the contributions to the Little Sisters of the Poor, who have an international outreach to the elderly.

In a November 11th letter to the faithful of his diocese, Bishop Morlino assured them that the diocesan portion would continue to support “important tasks of assisting the poor of our own diocese.”

He insisted, however, that their money would not be allowed to support groups violating Church teaching.  “In light of recent discussions and protests regarding money from CCHD going to fund ACORN and other entities which do not uphold, and sometimes act in opposition to, the teachings of the Church,” he said, “I feel it necessary to make clear that your money will not go to such groups.”

According to CCHD policy, every funded group must be vetted by the local bishop.  Of the collected funds, however, 25 percent remains in the diocese, while 75 percent goes to the national fund, which is then distributed to grantees throughout the nation.  So while a local bishop has control over which groups are funded in his own diocese, if his diocese contributes to the national fund he cannot personally ensure that the funds go only to grantees that are in line with Church teaching.

Bishop Baker held his second annual collection for the Church of Latin America in lieu of the CCHD collection.  In a November 6th letter, he informed the faithful of this collection for November 21-22 and extolled the good work brought about in the past by American Catholics’ donations to Latin America.

At the end, he wrote: “The offertory envelopes you have may include an envelope for ‘Catholic Campaign for Human Development,’ instead of the ‘Church in Latin America.’  If this is the case, just cross out the ‘Campaign’ name, and write in ‘Church in Latin America’ for this year.”

Stephen Phelan, communications manager for Human Life International, and spokesman for Reform CCHD Now, said he was “pleased” at the leadership exercised by these bishops.  “Of course we’re pleased that some bishops have chosen to suspend their support of the CCHD until serious reforms are made, or until they are sure that the groups they support do not oppose the Church in any way,” he commented.  “These are positive developments, and very much in keeping with the call of our shepherds to lead their flocks in service and in truth.”
 
“We continue to watch for major reforms at the national level, and stand ready to support the CCHD should these reforms happen,” he stated.  “We continue to pray that these reforms will take place and that the CCHD can be a cause that unifies Catholics instead of one that divides us.”
 

See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

CCHD in Archdiocese of Chicago Says it is Working to Fix Problems 

CCHD Responds to Reform Movement

SOURCE: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/nov/09112305.html

Pro-Life and Conservative Critics of Senate Health Care Bill Fault Abortion Funding and Taxes on Married Couples

….Douglas Johnson, Legislative Director of the Right to Life Committee, said the Senate bill would authorize the federal government to pay for “any and all abortions” through the proposed “public option” plan and also to subsidize the purchase of private plans that cover abortion on demand. He charged that President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid know abortion-promoting policies are “deeply unpopular” and try to conceal them with “contorted definitions and money-laundering schemes.”….
 
CATHOLIC NEWS AGENCY, NOV. 23, 2009

- Pro-life and conservative leaders reacted critically to the Senate’s Saturday decision to proceed on a Senate bill they say would provide government funding for elective abortion, create a new tax penalty on married couples and fail to protect the consciences of health care providers. Family Research Council President Tony Perkins charged that the vote disregards the consciences of the majority of Americans and would create “the largest expansion of abortions since the 1970s.”

“Forcing Americans to buy government approved health care insurance is arguably unconstitutional. Forcing Americans to fund abortion within the government plan is without question unconscionable,” Perkins said in a statement.

He expressed disappointment that pro-life Sens. Bill Nelson (D-Neb.) and Bob Casey (D-Penn.) voted to advance the bill.

Perkins said the Senate should have included the “bipartisan” Stupak-Pitts Amendment passed in the U.S. House. Instead, he charged, it includes a “watered down version” of the Capps Amendment which would fund the abortion industry.

Wendy Wright, President of Concerned Women of America, said that several Senators have “tried to have it both ways.”

“They say they oppose the bill yet at the most crucial time when only one Democrat senator could have changed or killed the bill, they supported it,” Wright said.

She contrasted the vote on the Senate bill with a vote last year on an amendment to ensure that federal funds did not pay for abortions through the Indian Health Care Improvement Act. Eight Democratic Senators, including Nelson and Casey, voted for that provision.

“Harry Reid’s bill will impose a new tax penalty on married couples who jointly make $250,000 annually. People who ‘shack up’ can earn up to $200,000 each before being taxed,” Wright charged.

She claimed that the Senate bill could fine those with “unacceptable” health insurance, cause five million to lose employer-covered health insurance, cut Medicare by over $460 million and leave 24 million without insurance.

Also critical was Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser, who said the failure of pro-life Democrats in the Senate was “gravely disappointing.”

“Senators should consider themselves on notice: America is still waiting for you to strike government funded abortion from this legislation,” she added.

Dannenfelser said Sens. Casey, Nelson, Mary Landrieu (D-La.), Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) will be held “especially accountable.”

“Their first opportunity to defend Life was on the motion to proceed. Their last chance will be on the final cloture vote to end debate. A vote to close debate without the addition of strong pro-life language will be a vote for government-funded abortion,” she said, calling the last the “ultimate betrayal” of pro-life constituents and others who oppose government-funded abortion.

Dr. Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life Action described the Senate bill as providing for an “unprecedented” expansion of federally funded abortion. She charged that the legislation moves towards redefining abortion as health care, fails to protect the consciences of medical providers and fails to prohibit federal funding of assisted suicide.

She praised the House health care bill’s restrictions on abortion funding as a demonstration of a “bipartisan pro-life majority.”

Douglas Johnson, Legislative Director of the Right to Life Committee, said the Senate bill would authorize the federal government to pay for “any and all abortions” through the proposed “public option” plan and also to subsidize the purchase of private plans that cover abortion on demand.

He charged that President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid know abortion-promoting policies are “deeply unpopular” and try to conceal them with “contorted definitions and money-laundering schemes.”

Johnson recalled that the Stupak-Pitts Amendment passed in the U.S. House by 240-194. He said that a “courageous group of pro-life Democrats” in the House will oppose final approval of health care legislation if that Amendment is “gutted or removed.”

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=17812

Catholic Bishops Reiterate that Senate Health Care Bill is ‘Fundamentally Flawed’

- In a teleconference Monday afternoon, representatives of the USCCB reiterated that the current Senate health care bill needs “substantial improvement” before it can be considered anything but morally unacceptable for Catholics. Present at the teleconference were John Carr, Executive Director of the USCCB’s Department of Justice, Peace and Human Development; Kevin Applby, Director of the Office of Migration Policy and Public Affairs; Kathy Saile, Director of the Office of Domestic Policy; and Richard Doerflinger, Associate Director of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat of Pro-Life Activities.

The spokesmen for the USCCB noted that the Senate’s version of the health care bill falls short in three regards: abortion funding and conscience protection, immigrants rights in regards to health care, and accessibility and affordability.

The current version of the Senate bill does not allow undocumented immigrants to purchase federal health insurance with their own money and maintains the five year ban on legal immigrants having access to Medicaid.

For 24 million Americans who are well below the poverty line, the bill does not affect their access or ability to afford health insurance.

“To lose the precedent of no federal funding for abortion for the first time since Roe v Wade, to say that people, by law, have to pay for other peoples’ abortions would be a fundamental failure,” said John Carr. “Keeping in place the existing protections against federal funding for abortion seems frankly like a modest goal” as is “making sure that affordable and accessible health care is really affordable and accessible,” he added. Continue reading

GOSPEL & MEDITATION: Why So Glum?

Father Edward McIlmail, LC

Luke 21:5-11

While some people were speaking about how the Temple was adorned with costly stones and votive offerings, Jesus said, “All that you see here — the days will come when there will not be left a stone upon another stone that will not be thrown down.” Then they asked him, “Teacher, when will this happen? And what sign will there be when all these things are about to happen?” He answered, “See that you not be deceived, for many will come in my name, saying, ´I am he,´ and ´The time has come.´ Do not follow them! When you hear of wars and insurrections, do not be terrified; for such things must happen first, but it will not immediately be the end.” Then he said to them, “Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be powerful earthquakes, famines and plagues from place to place; and awesome sights and mighty signs will come from the sky.”

Introductory Prayer: Lord Jesus, thank you for this special time I have with you. It´s one of the few calm moments of the day. Your presence reassures me that I don´t have to endure the trials of the day alone. You are my strength and my peace. I wish to abide in your love.

Petition: Jesus, help me to keep hoping despite the crises in my life.

1. Temple of Doom For the Jews, the Temple in Jerusalem was the center of religious and cultural life. It contained the Holy of Holies, the sanctuary that once housed the Ark of the Covenant. The people were proud of the Temple, but Jesus warns them that the day will arrive when it will be destroyed (as indeed it was, in A.D. 70). Yet the end of the Temple will not be the end of religion. Jesus himself will remain with us, as he does to this day, in the Eucharist. Likewise, no matter what else passes away — our house, our office, our school — Christ remains. Does that belief fill me with confidence?

2. Be Not Deceived Jesus doesn´t directly answer the question about when the Temple will be destroyed. Rather, he tries to get his listeners to focus on what is really important: their faith. Our Lord warns them not to listen to the wrong people. Throughout the course of a normal day, to whom do we listen? Whose voices are on our radios, our TV sets? Who really has our ear day–by-day? Worldly talk-show hosts? The news media´s “instant experts”? MTV gurus? Jesus cautions us that the people we listen to might affect the quality of our lives — and the quality of our eternity. Do I judge carefully, then, the voices I listen to?

3. Do Not Be Terrified Tsunamis, floods, terrorist attacks, wars, abortion, euthanasia — is the world a nicer place today than in Jesus´ time? Our Lord was no stranger to bad news. He knew about the tower in Siloam that killed 18 people (see Luke 13:4) — and he knew what awaited him on Good Friday. Yet he always remained hopeful and encouraged the best in people. As his followers, we too must be witnesses to hope. We need to brighten the lives of those around us. More importantly we need to remind others that God will win in the end. “Good, not evil, has the last word,” Pope John Paul II told the general audience of Oct. 17, 2001, “God triumphs over the hostile powers, even when they seem great and invincible.”

Conversation with Christ: Lord, I know in my mind that you will win in the end. If only my heart would believe that, too! Grant me this grace. Grant that my life will show that kind of optimism at every moment.

Resolution: I will make a small sacrifice or offer up a special prayer for someone suffering today.

http://www.regnumchristi.org/english/articulos/articulo.phtml?se=363&ca=975&te=735&id=20302

ST. ANDREW DUNG-LAC AND COMPANIONS

CATHOLIC NEWS AGENCY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009


On June 19, 1988, Pope John Paul II canonized a group of 117 martyrs who died for the Roman Catholic Faith in Vietnam during the nineteenth century. The group was made up of ninety-six Vietnamese, eleven Spaniards, and ten French. Eight of the group were bishops, fifty were priests and fifty-nine were lay Catholics. Some of the priests were Dominicans. Others were diocesan priests who belonged to the Paris Mission Society. One such diocesan priest was St. Theophane Venard. (His feast day is November 6.)

St. Andrew Dung-Lac, who represents this group of heroes, was a Vietnamese diocesan priest. He came from a poor, non-Christian family and was taught by a Christian lay catechist. He worked in the missions with the priests of the Foreign Mission Society of Paris. He was imprisoned and repeatedly tortured during the persecutions of Minh-Meng, the emperor of Vietnam between 1820 and 1840 who was famed for his persecutions of the Christians. Among the many Vietnamese and international martyrs who died alongside St. Andrew Dung-Lac was Saint Peter Thi.

This feast day, and the witnesses of the lives of the martyrs, give testament to the sufferings inflicted on the Vietnamese Church, which are among the most terrible in the long history of Christian martyrdom.

MONDAY, NOV. 23, 2009

Congress May Not Listen to Us, But Can’t We Still Laugh At Them?



Passing major legislation on Saturday night is a symptom of Potomac Fever

http://patriotpost.us/edition/2009/11/23/brief/

 

Michael Ramirez Cartoon

CCHD: It’s All About Politics 11-20-09

CCHD: Does it really stand for “the Catholic Campaign to Help Democrats”?

See all the videos on this subject
http://www.realcatholictv.net/defundcchd/

Glenn Beck Announces Education Conventions for 2010

Glenn Beck: Education is key, and not just for our children. To that end, we will be conducting a series of conventions. These will be full-day experiences where you will be immersed in learning about topics ranging from self-reliance, community organizing, the economy and how to be a political force in your own neighborhood and country. The first one will be in Orlando at UCF Arena on March 27th.

Mary Landrieu Takes Louisianans for a Ride

….Consider that under government-controlled health care the cost for mandatory insurance per family is expected to be $15,000.  The average family’s premiums will climb $1,700.  Expect new or higher taxes on medical devices, like wheel chairs, pacemakers and hearing aids.  Also, expect a threshold increase in deductible medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%….

By J. Robert Smith. American Thinker, November 23, 2009

All it took for Senator Mary Landrieu to vote to open debate on the Democrats’ leviathan health care reform measure was a $100 million.  Or was it $300 million, as Landrieu claims?  That’s $100 million in aid to Louisiana for disaster relief plus another $200 million for Medicaid or whatever else she could weasel.  And whatever she’s saying about being undecided on final passage, don’t buy it.  The only way she’ll cart off the dough is if the bill passes.   

If the Democrats’ health care grab ever becomes a reality, plenty of Louisianans will end up paying through the nose like the rest of us taxpayers. 
Democrat Harry Reid and the Boys Club that runs the Senate needed Landrieu’s vote in the worst sort of way.  With no Republicans crossing the aisle to vote with the Democrats, Reid needed all 58 Democrats plus Bernie Sanders (Vermont Socialist) and independent Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman to gain 60 votes for cloture to proceed to debate.
There’s no telling what the final “bill” will be for having bought enough votes to grease the skids for government-run health care.  It may have already been paid for through the president’s failed economic stimulus program. The sordid details are sure to dribble out in the coming days.      
From President Obama’s and Harry Reid’s standpoint, the $100 million to $300 million they’re doling out to Landrieu is chump change to win a critical vote to create game-changing government-controlled health care.  Landrieu’s stash is on par with a cheap date.  Burger King and a dollar movie stuff. 
In other words, for these men, who want to move the country radically left, the payoff matters far less than the game-changing result.  
Though Landrieu’s take is sizeable, consider that whatever legislation that emerges from the Senate, and then out of a conference committee with the House, will easily bust the trillion dollar mark.  Republicans estimate it will come closer to $2.5 trillion dollars.  They may well be right.      
Aside from the Democrats’ baseless claims that government-run health care will be as good or better than the current health care system, what Louisianans get in federal largess will be more than offset through higher taxes, endless government debt and inflation.
Louisianans, like all Americans, will be socked with higher hidden, and not so hidden, taxes.  When the government mandates that Americans buy something like health insurance, or dictates minimum standards for insurance that raise costs, those are taxes. 
Consider that under government-controlled health care the cost for mandatory insurance per family is expected to be $15,000.  The average family’s premiums will climb $1,700.  Expect new or higher taxes on medical devices, like wheel chairs, pacemakers and hearing aids.  Also, expect a threshold increase in deductible medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%.
The topper is that by Year Five of government-run health care, families with an average income of $75,000 will pay a 40% tax on health insurance premiums.       
Not exactly sounding like a plan to only gouge the wealthy, huh?   
And as T.V. hucksters say, “Wait, that’s not all.”  States — and that includes Louisiana — are going to be walloped by another mandate.  Democrats want to expand Medicaid eligibility.  Their legislation will force states to pick up the tabs.  Since states can’t print money, nor can they borrow indefinitely, then either other services will be slashed to generate the new Medicaid funds or — you got it — taxes will increase.  And borrowed money needs to be repaid.  Any which way, taxpayers lose. 
Even with the Medicaid buy-down that Landrieu claims to have gotten, there will still be significant attendant cost to the states.  When was the last time that Medicaid’s or Medicare’s actual costs fell below estimates?  
As for the Medicare dependent elderly, they’ll have to ante up too, to the tune of $400 million in Medicare cuts, the money to be shifted to the new government scheme.
There are some 650,000 Medicare recipients in Louisiana.  Most are retirees who paid taxes for much of their working lives with the promise and expectation that Medicare would be there for them when they needed it.  What seniors may get is a stripped down version of what they were promised.  So much for politicians’ promises. 
But wait, that’s still not all.  With the nation already under mountains of debt, government-run health care will merely pile more debt upon it.  We’re not talking here about a straw breaking a camel’s back.  We’re talking about tons of rock crushing the camel.
The Democrats’ proposals are built on faulty assumptions, on rosy projections of cost savings and revenues collection.  When the Democrats’ loopy fantasy falls flat, how will they propose paying the freight?  What if foreigners, especially the Chinese, decide to unload some of their U.S. bonds or cease to buy more?  Will the Democrats print more funny money to cover costs?  Isn’t inflation called the cruelest tax?  Will they insist on raising yet more taxes on those mythical legions of the rich?
And haven’t we all read something about a recession?  Despite the propaganda, the recession is lingering like a bad cold.  If it goes to the nation’s chest, it could be real trouble.  Higher taxes, bigger government and inflation are sure-fire ways to turn a cold into pneumonia.
Come, come.  Who’s going to take it in the shorts when the Democrats’ House of Health Care Cards tumbles down?  Why, average, hardworking Americans, of course. 
Among those average, hardworking Americans are plenty of Louisianans, who today may think Mary Landrieu is just swell for bringing home the bacon.  That is, until they discover that the cost of the bacon is really coming out of their wallets.

 

But while the Senator is preening like a peacock about the fat she plans to ladle from the federal pork barrel, Louisiana taxpayers and Medicare recipients should consider this: Be it $100 million or $300 million or something in-between, there’s no such thing as a free lunch — or free disaster relief or whatever else.   

 

Categories

Archives

Meta

“As Christians we must love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us, but as Christians we must also stand up for what we believe and always be ready to fight for the Faith. The days in which we live now require heroic Catholicism, not casual Catholicism. We can no longer be Catholics by accident, but instead be Catholics by conviction.”



real estate: realestate-us.info