HHS Drafting Strategic Plan: Life Begins at Conception, Ends at Natural Death

LifeSiteNews: A Biblical Interpretation of Fatima’s Miracle of the Sun
October 14, 2017
The Brilliance of the Fatima Prayer
October 14, 2017

By Rachel Alexander, The Stream, Oct. 13, 2017

Rachel AlexanderIn a startling breakthrough not seen even in the last Bush administration, the Department of Health and Human Services now says that life begins at conception. The claim appears fives time in the draft of its “Strategic Plan FY 2018 – 2022.”

The Obama administration’s last version of this document used the ambiguous phrase “at every stage of life.” The administration’s aggressive pro-choice policies showed that the period before birth was not necessarily one of those stages.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) tweeted out his approval.

Senator Ted Cruz 

Photo published for HHS Defines Life as Beginning "at Conception", by Wesley J. Smith, National Review

HHS Defines Life as Beginning “at Conception”, by Wesley J. Smith, National Review

The Department of Health and Human Services has published a draft strategic plan for 2018-2022 that includes some, shall we say, controversial language. See if you can spot it: Mission Statement The… nationalreview.com

Beginning at Conception

Earlier this month, HHS shared a draft of the Strategic Plan. It plots what the department will do 2018 to 2022. The introduction explains that the “HHS accomplishes its mission through programs and initiatives … serving and protecting Americans at every stage of life, beginning at conception.”

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity.Support The Stream »

That’s not the only such statement in the 65-page draft. “Life at conception” is mentioned four other times. For example, the introduction to the third “strategic goal” declares the HHS’s

dedication to serve all Americans from conception to natural death, but especially those individuals and populations facing or at high risk for economic and social well-being challenges, through effective human services.

The goal is titled “Strengthen the Economic and Social Well-Being of Americans across the Lifespan.” It’s one of five. The others cover the health care system, the health of Americans, and support for the sciences.

However, the only mention of the unborn in the draft plan comes as one of the ways to “Support healthy development and well-being of children and youth.” HHS wants to “Protect women and their unborn children from harm and harmful exposures during pregnancy, and promote recommended protective prenatal and postpartum behaviors, including encouragement of breast-feeding when possible.”

Secularists say this view is “religious.” But in fact, the DHS’s new policy reflects modern science. As Wesley J. Smith observed in National Review, that human life begins at fertilization “is a fact of basic biological science — as embryology text books attest.” The American College of Pediatricians said the same thing in a statement last March.

Broad Change in Direction Under Trump

The change is part of a broad effort to protect religious freedom and the right to life. Obama had rolled back those protections.

The change reflects modern science.

For example, the HHS recently exempted religious groups from the Obamacare “contraception mandate.” Obama’s HHS insisted that almost all employers provide contraception. The administration persecuted religious groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor who refused to go along.

It is unclear how the changes might affect HHS’s existing Title X Family Planning program. It supports “family planning clinics [that] play a critical role in ensuring access to a broad range of family planning and preventive health services.” Those facilities don’t provide abortions with government funds. Under the current rules, they provide “neutral” counseling on abortion. Worse, they refer women who say they want one to abortion providers.

Inevitable Opposition

Pro-choice groups quickly recognized the threat to their use of the government. Mara Gandal-Powers, senior counsel at the National Women’s Law Center, claimed that the new language “doesn’t have legal force.” Others declared that it discriminates. They urge people to leave negative comments.

The public can comment until Oct. 27. Pro-life groups urge people to comment, to counteract pro-choice groups’ expected push to remove that language.


Rachel Alexander is a senior editor at The Stream. She is a political columnist and the founder and editor of Intellectual Conservative.

She is a regular contributor to Townhall, the Selous Foundation for Public Policy ResearchThe Christian Post and Right Wing News. She frequently appears on TV and news radio as a conservative commentator, and hosted a radio show on 960 KKNT in Phoenix and then on UStream

She is a recovering attorney and former gun magazine editor.She previously served as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Arizona, corporate attorney for Go Daddy Software, and Special Assistant/Deputy County Attorney for the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office. As co-president of the UW Political Science Honor Society, she obtained degrees in Political Science and History from the University of Washington, followed by a law degree from Boston College and the University of Arizona. 

She was ranked by Right Wing News as one of the 50 Best Conservative Columnists from 2011-2016 and is a recipient of Americans for Prosperity’s RightOnline Activist of the Year award.

Follow Rachel on Twitter at Rach_IC.

iStockphoto and Shannon Henderson