Remembering the Day When the ‘Politics of Personal Destruction’ Began, by Phil Lawler

Msgr. Charles Pope: Which Do You Prefer: Melons and Leeks, or the Bread of Heaven?
August 6, 2019
Lessons From the Shire: How to Live a Simple Life According to Tolkien’s Middle-Earth, by Philip Kosloski
August 6, 2019

By Phil Lawler, Catholic Culture, Aug 05, 2019

“The growing plague of offense and disrespect in speech and actions must end,” says Archbishop Wilton Gregory in his highly publicized response to President Trump’s remarks about squalor in Baltimore. “I fear that recent public comments by our President and others and the responses they have generated, have deepened division and diminished our national life.”

Who could disagree? Whether you’re a fan or a foe of President Trump, you cannot deny the nasty partisan divisions in America, the ugly tone of public debates that have degenerated into shouting matches and worse.

The problem that I see with Archbishop Gregory’s message lies in the fact that our bishops have (as usual) arrived late on the scene. The “politics of personal destruction” had become a regular feature of our nation’s political discourse long before Donald Trump—and his vociferous critics—arrived on the scene.

When did it all begin? That’s a question worthy of a doctoral dissertation by some aspiring historian (if one hasn’t already been written). But for a quick answer, I’d point to July 31, 1987, after President Reagan nominated Robert Bork for a seat on the Supreme Court. A leading member of the US Senate promptly rose to say: ….