Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Ripple Effects: AZ’s Voter Pamphlet Will Refer to Baby as “Unborn Human Being” Rather Than “Fetus”, by Nancy Flory – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

Ripple Effects: AZ’s Voter Pamphlet Will Refer to Baby as “Unborn Human Being” Rather Than “Fetus”, by Nancy Flory

Rev. James V. Schall, S.J. (1928-2019): On News Reports (Aug. 2018)

August 22, 2024

Mary’s Queenship Directs Us to Her Son and to Motherhood, by Carl E. Olson

August 22, 2024

In utero. YouTube.

By Nancy Flory, The Stream, August 21, 2024

Nancy Flory, Ph.D., is a senior editor at The Stream. You can follow her @NancyFlory3, and follow The Stream @Streamdotorg.

This November, Arizona voters will decide whether to add the “right” to an abortion to their state constitution. However, those voters may be surprised if they read the voter pamphlet.

Why? Because in describing the new laws and measures being proposed, the pamphlet will refer to the baby as an “unborn human being,” rather than “fetus,” the term abortions supporters prefer, thanks to an August 14 ruling from the Arizona Supreme Court.

“The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that the pamphlet for voters can refer to a fetus as an ‘unborn human being’ because it is an unborn human being,” Arizona Right to Life Board Member Jill Norgaard told The Stream. …

Continue reading >>>>>>