Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the health-check domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
SCOTUS Sizes Up Colorado’s Ban on ‘Conversion Therapy’, by Andrea M. Picciotti-Bayer – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

SCOTUS Sizes Up Colorado’s Ban on ‘Conversion Therapy’, by Andrea M. Picciotti-Bayer

Democrats Want to Use Our Tax Dollars to Fund Abortions Under Obamacare, by Mat Staver

October 8, 2025

“The Truth Is Coming Out”… Russian President’s Special Envoy: Biden “Provoked the War in Ukraine to Cover Up His Family’s Corruption”, by Jim Hoft

October 8, 2025

By Andrea M. Picciotti-Bayer, National Catholic Register, October 7, 2025

Andrea M. Picciotti-Bayer Andrea Picciotti-Bayer is a legal analyst for EWTN News, and director of the Conscience Project.

COMMENTARY: Oral argument in the ‘Chiles v. Salazar’ case indicates that a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court’s justices believe the ban is a violation of the First Amendment’s free speech guarantee.

After Tuesday morning’s oral argument in Chiles v. Salazar, it is clear that a majority — if not all nine justices — agree that an exacting review known as “strict scrutiny” should apply to Colorado’s ban on so-called “conversion therapy,” given its profound impact on the First Amendment’s free speech guarantee.

The case involves whether a state may forbid a licensed counselor from engaging in certain kinds of voluntary “talk therapy” with minors struggling with confusion related to sexual orientation and gender identity. …

Continue reading >>>>>>>>>>>