Supreme Court Protects Minors From Gender Ideology, by Andrea M. Picciotti-Bayer
Sowing or Reaping? There is No Third Option, by Dr. Jeff Mirus
June 19, 2025
The Problems – and Promise – of Cell Phones for Kids, by Caleb Kruse
June 19, 2025
Author: Phil Roeder. Supreme Court of the United States. The nine chairs of the Justices lined up in the Court Chamber... Creative Commons - You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. ....
By Andrea M. Picciotti-Bayer, National Catholic Register, June 18, 2025
Andrea Picciotti-Bayer is a legal analyst for EWTN News, and director of the Conscience Project.
COMMENTARY: The 6-3 ruling in U.S. v. Skrmetti affirms the state’s right to protect vulnerable minors from experimental procedures.
The Supreme Court Wednesday morning kept in place a Tennessee law banning medical “gender transitions” on minors.
The 6-3 decision in U.S. v. Skrmetti protects vulnerable children from the snares of gender ideology and safeguards our Constitution from being manipulated by this sinister ideology.
In 2023, Tennessee restricted medical “transition” treatments for minors, enacting SB1 — the Prohibition on Medical Procedures Performed on Minors Related to Sexual Identity. Three “transgender” youth, their parents and a doctor challenged the law, claiming that it violated the equal protection guarantee of the 14th Amendment.
A trial court partially stopped SB1, ruling that transgender people are a “quasi-suspect” class, that the Tennessee law discriminates against people on the basis of sex and transgender status and that the law could not survive heightened judicial scrutiny. The 6th Circuit reversed, holding that the law did not require such scrutiny and survived review under the less rigorous “rational basis” review. The Supreme Court agreed. …
Continue reading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Related posts
July 10, 2025
