The Impeachment Theater of the Absurd

Vatican Building Hosts Ad for Netflix’s ‘Two Popes’ Film Denigrating Pope Benedict, by Barillas and Baklinski
December 19, 2019
Louisiana Democrat Explains Why She’s Defending A Pro-Life Law Before The Supreme Court, by Josh Shepherd
December 19, 2019

Ironically, by claiming he needs more witnesses, Schumer is admitting that the House impeachment case is insufficient!

By Mark Alexander, Patriot Post, Dec. 18, 2019

“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” —U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 4 (1789)

In Federalist No. 65, Alexander Hamilton outlined the Senate’s powers of impeachment, noting: “Where else than in the Senate could have been found a tribunal sufficiently dignified, or sufficiently independent? What other body would be likely to feel confidence enough in its own situation, to preserve, unawed and uninfluenced, the necessary impartiality between an individual accused, and the representatives of the people, his accusers.”

In 1788, our Founders anticipated that future senators should possess at least a modicum of decency, such that they would be able to judge articles of impeachment on the merits of such charges.

But Hamilton also noted that impeachment would “agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused.” He concluded, “In many cases it will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influence, and interest on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” ….

Read more here  https://patriotpost.us/alexander/67474-the-impeachment-theater-of-the-absurd-2019-12-18