Daily Scripture Readings and Meditation: Many Were Made WellFebruary 7, 2022
The Creed of the Shallow Man, by David LarsonFebruary 7, 2022
By Tony Perkins, Patriot Post, Feb. 4, 2022
A scathing Johns Hopkins meta-analysis concluded by saying lockdowns “should be rejected out of hand as pandemic policy.”
Three months after Dr. Anthony Fauci declared, “I am the science,” the science begs to disagree. An explosive new study from Johns Hopkins has taken the world by storm, slamming the idea of mass lockdowns to fight COVID — and destroying whatever scrap of credibility Fauci had left. Not only did the lockdowns disrupt lives, but they also had “little to no effect” in saving them. They hurt us socially, economically, and mentally, the researchers concluded, “with devastating effects.” If the lockdowns benefited anyone, it turns out, it was the politicians — who used them to expand power they never should have had.
The meta-analysis, which took into account dozens and dozens of other studies on the subject, was so scathing that it concluded by saying lockdowns “should be rejected out of hand as pandemic policy.” Fauci, who insisted the idea “saved hundreds of millions of infections and millions of lives,” was wrong again. The mortality rate in the United States and Europe dropped by a measly 0.2 percent — while other deaths, from suicide, overdoses, starvation, and lack of medical care, robbed the world of hundreds of thousands of lives….
Continue reading >>>>