The Nuclear Family Is Still Indispensable, by Wilcox, Boyd

Cardinal Burke: No Catholic Can Justify Policies That Promote Abortion and Biden Consistently Does, by Michael W. Chapman
February 29, 2020
Fr. Ed Broom: 10 Prayer Practices for the Best Lent
February 29, 2020

By W. Bradford Wilcox, Hal Boyd, The Atlantic, Feb. 21, 2020

Senior fellow at the Institute for Family Studies
Hal Boyd, Associate professor of family law and policy at Brigham Young University

Rumors of its demise have been greatly exaggerated—and it remains the stablest environment in which to raise children

The nuclear family is disintegrating—or so Americans might conclude from what they watch and read. The quintessential nuclear family consists of a married couple raising their children. But from Oscar-winning Marriage Story’s gut-wrenching portrayal of divorce or the Harvard sociologist Christina Cross’s New York Times op-ed in December, “The Myth of the Two-Parent Home,” discounting the importance of marriage for kids, one might draw the conclusion that marriage is more endangered than ever—and that this might not be such a bad thing.

Meanwhile, the writer David Brooks recently described the post–World War II American concept of family as a historical aberration—a departure from a much older tradition in which parents, grandparents, siblings, and cousins all look out for the well-being of children. In an article in The Atlantic bearing the headline “The Nuclear Family Was a Mistake,” Brooks argued that the “nuclear family has been crumbling in slow motion for decades.” He sees extended families and what he calls “forged families”—single parents, single adults, and others coming together to support one another and children—as filling the vacuum created by the breakdown of the nuclear family. ….

Read more here: