Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the health-check domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
The Supreme Court Is Poised to Strike Down Race-Based Redistricting, by Stephen B. Presser – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

The Supreme Court Is Poised to Strike Down Race-Based Redistricting, by Stephen B. Presser

Europe’s “Civilizational Erasure” Happened When it Snubbed John Paul II, by Peter Wolfgang
December 8, 2025
Raking In Hundreds Of Millions For Trafficking Kids Destroys U.S. Catholic Bishops’ Credibility On Immigration, by Maureen Mullarkey
December 8, 2025

Louisiana Congressional Districts for the 119th Congress under dispute in Louisiana v. Calais (Twotwofourtysix via Wikimedia Commons CC-SA-4.0 / Modified by Chronicles)

By Stephen B. Presser, Chronicles, December 2025

Stephen B. Presser is the legal affairs editor for Chronicles magazine. He is the Raoul Berger Professor of Legal History Emeritus at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law and Professor of Business Law Emeritus at the Kellogg School of Management. He is a leading American legal historian and expert on shareholder liability for corporate debts.

Stephen B. PresserAbortion, religion, and race were the three intractable constitutional law conundrums of the second half of the 20th century. Back in the 1960s and ’70s, the justices of the Warren and Burger Supreme Courts felt compelled to step in and resolve them, though their constitutional warrant so to do was anything but clear.

As readers of this magazine are well aware, for decades American society has been roiled by what we are slowly coming to see as the Supreme Court’s unwarranted judicial audacity—if not impudence, arrogance, and illegitimacy. Since Richard Nixon’s campaign in 1968, Republicans have been seeking to correct what they regard as the unwarranted aggrandizement of federal court intrusion into the prerogatives of state and local governments. Only as a result of Donald Trump’s appointments of Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett are we witnessing what may be a successful attempt to correct this glaring judicial error. …

Continue reading >>>>>>>