To Restore Integrity: Newman’s Idea of Education, by Patrick Reilly

Fr. Raymond J. de Souza: Threat of Schism Comes From Germany, Not United States
September 19, 2019
Does the Religious Left Know What Lenin Said About Christians and Socialism? by Dr. Paul Kengor
September 19, 2019

*Image: John Newman by Sir Leslie Ward, 1877 [National Portrait Gallery, London]. From the series Men of the Day No. 145, “Tracts for Our Times,” published in Vanity Fair (January 20, 1877)

By Patrick Reilly, The Catholic Thing, Sept. 19, 2019

Note: This is the fifth column in our series about Cardinal Newman, who will be canonized on October 13. The previous columns on this subject may be read by clicking hereherehere, and here– Robert Royal

Patrick ReillyOver the course of his lifetime, John Henry Newman was many things: scholar, reformer, preacher, convert, theologian, priest, and cardinal. Through it all, however, he was an educator. Cor ad cor loquitur (“Heart speaks to heart”) was his motto, and he believed strongly that “personal influence” is the best means of teaching the truths of our Catholic faith.

“Speaking from heart to heart” was so much his manner that students at Oxford and later Dublin’s Catholic University would flock to hear his sermons. His guidance inspired the high-school boys at the Oratory School in Birmingham, England, including Hilaire Belloc. And Newman met personally with parents to forge genuine partnerships in the care of souls – an unusual practice at the time for English boarding schools.

The practical schoolmaster was also a great visionary, whose Idea of a University and University Sketches helped define the Catholic university at a time when education was splintering into diverse models and objectives. Amid many pastoral works, Newman also wrote numerous texts of devotion and theology on topics such as the Blessed Virgin Mary, development of doctrine, the role of the laity in the Church, and the nature of conscience.

It is extraordinary to find so many achievements in one man. And how do we reconcile the private Newman with the public intellectual, who eagerly battled “liberalism in religion”? ….