Whatever That Was, It Wasn’t a ‘Stunt’, by Edward Peters

Comfort is Killing the Church
October 23, 2019
When “Consent” and “Control” Replace Morals and Virtue, By David G Bonagura, Jr.
October 23, 2019


By Edward Peters, JD, JCD, Ref. Sig. Ap., October 22, 2019

A few days ago men removed some female figurines (centerpieces for several weird ceremonies in Rome the last few weeks) from a church and tossed them into the Tiber River. Vatican spokesman Paolo Ruffini dismissed the act as a “stunt”. Regardless of how one assess this act, however, I think it not accurate to describe it as a mere “stunt”.

A “stunt” is a gesture that calls attention to a problem but does not itself solve the problem. For example, chaining oneself to a lamppost could call attention to the plight of the unjustly imprisoned but does not itself free the imprisoned. Standing on the corner with one’s mouth duct-taped might call attention to the suffering of the voiceless but does not itself give them a voice. Such acts are stunts, good stunts or bad, but in the end, stunts. What the Tiber men did was different.

Removing these figures from a church and tossing them into the Tiber does not simply call attention to the problem of setting up such objects in a church it also removes the statues from the church and thus solves the problem of having them set up in a sacred place. Such an act, good act or bad, is more than a “stunt”, it is form of direct action against a problem.  …

Read more at  https://canonlawblog.wordpress.com/2019/10/22/whatever-that-was-it-wasnt-a-stunt/