Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the health-check domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131
White Papers Policy Institute: The Party That Forgot Its Base: How the GOP has Failed White America (Part 2) – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

White Papers Policy Institute: The Party That Forgot Its Base: How the GOP has Failed White America (Part 2)

How the SSPX Stays Loyal to Rome, by Joseph Bevan
March 18, 2026
Behind the Scenes: The Supreme Court Protects Parental Rights, by Jeffrey M. Trissell
March 18, 2026

Image by Grok. "White Americans are more likely to say being “American” is central to their identity than being “white.”" "The Party That Forgot Its Base..." By White Papers Policy Institute

By White Papers Policy Institute, March 18, 2026

This is part two of a three-part series examining the Republican Party’s race-neutral ‘colorblind’ strategy and its effects on its core voters. Part one can be found here.

 

When one side treats politics as a contest of ideas and the other as a struggle against moral enemies, “neutrality” becomes a one-sided disadvantage.

In a paper by Petsko & Kteily (2023), political dehumanization was measured along two axes: viewing opponents as “immature” versus viewing them as “savage.” Conservatives tended to see liberals as immature, whereas liberals were more likely to view conservatives as savage. Both sides roughly understood how the other perceived them. But here is the imbalance: liberals overestimated how much conservatives dehumanized them, while conservatives underestimated how much liberals dehumanized them. Additionally, the absolute level of dehumanization flowed more strongly from left to right than the reverse.

Another paper, Casey et al. (2023), conducted four studies and found a similar asymmetry in empathy. In both the U.S. and the U.K., liberals were less likely than conservatives to extend empathy toward the suffering of political opponents. They judged opponents’ moral character more harshly and were more inclined to view them as actively harmful. These patterns held regardless of which party was in power, and they were not explained by perceived dominance. …