A High Court Case That Challenges the Rule of Law, by Phil Lawler
36 MPs Who Voted for British Assisted Suicide Bill May Change Their Minds and Defeat It, by Susan Berry
December 5, 2024
Pope Francis Debuts Electric Popemobile as Part of Vatican’s ‘Ecological Conversion 2030’, by Michael Haynes
December 5, 2024
Panorama of the west facade of United States Supreme Court Building at dusk in Washington, D.C., USA. 10 October 2011. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Joe Ravi. You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work ....
By Phil Lawler, Catholic Culture, Dec 04, 2024
Phil Lawler has been a Catholic journalist for more than 30 years. He has edited several Catholic magazines and written eight books. Founder of Catholic World News, he is the news director and lead analyst at CatholicCulture.org.
As I write, the US Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in a case that would leave the founders of the American republic shaking their heads in disbelief, appalled that the court they established would indulge is such a distasteful theater of the absurd.
The case involves a challenge to the Tennessee law that makes it illegal to give minor children “medical care” that alters their sexual function. Mainstream newspapers, carefully obedient to the directives of gender theory, refer to such treatment as “gender-affirming care.” That Orwellian term conceals the reality that the treatments are intended for patients who deny their natural gender. The “medical care” involved does not ensure, but in fact frustrates, the natural functions of the body, at times by mutilation. It is not medical care, it does not affirm anything, and for that matter it does not change the patient’s gender, because one’s gender—or rather one’s sex—is fixed at birth. …
Continue reading >>>>>>>>>>>
Related posts
January 10, 2026
January 10, 2026
January 10, 2026