Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the health-check domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131
Aquinas and Prudential Judgment, by Dr. Edward Feser – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

Aquinas and Prudential Judgment, by Dr. Edward Feser

Aborted Babies are Being Flushed Into America’s Drinking Water, by Steven Ertelt 
July 14, 2025
Fr. David Howell: The Invisible God, Seen In the Fruits of Communion
July 14, 2025

Detail from "Apotheosis of St. Thomas Aquinas" (1631) by Francisco de Zurbaran [WikiArt.org]

By Dr. Edward Feser, Catholic World Report, July 13, 2025

Edward Feser is the author of several books on philosophy and morality, including All One in Christ: A Catholic Critique of Racism and Critical Race Theory (Ignatius Press, August 2022), and Five Proofs of the Existence of God and is co-author of By Man Shall His Blood Be Shed: A Catholic Defense of Capital Punishment, both also published by Ignatius Press.

There can be no reasonable disagreement among Catholics about whether abortion and euthanasia should be illegal. But there can be reasonable disagreement about a specific minimum wage law or health coverage for all.

In contemporary debates in Catholic moral theology, a distinction is often drawn between actions that are flatly ruled out in principle and those whose permissibility or impermissibility is a matter of prudential judgment. For example, it is often noted that abortion is wrong always and, in principle, whereas how many immigrants a country ought to allow in and under what conditions are matters of prudential judgment.

But exactly what does this mean, and how do we tell the difference between the cases? …

Continue reading >>>>>>>>>>