Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
‘Credibly Accused’ is Still Not ‘Guilty’, by Phil Lawler – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

‘Credibly Accused’ is Still Not ‘Guilty’, by Phil Lawler

Do you Believe Life Starts at Conception? Then Stop Calling Pregnant Women ‘Future Mothers’, by Georgiana Constantin-Parke
February 9, 2023
WATCH! LGBT Lobby Grows in the Vatican Under Pope Francis’ Watch, by John-Henry Westen
February 9, 2023

Photo by cottonbro: https://www.pexels.com/photo/a-priest-listening-to-the-person-confessing-9588737/

By Phil Lawler, Catholic Culture, Feb 08, 2023

Phil Lawler has been a Catholic journalist for more than 30 years. He has edited several Catholic magazines and written eight books. Founder of Catholic World News, he is the news director and lead analyst at CatholicCulture.org.

 

Bishop Robert McManus of Worcester, Massachusetts, has rediscovered the principle that a man is innocent until proven guilty—even if he is a priest.

The Worcester diocese this week released a report on clerical abuse, updating an earlier report from 2004. The new report, breaking with the pattern set by other Catholic dioceses, did not provide the names of all priests who have been “credibly accused.”

“There is no other precedent for the publishing of lists of the accused in society,” Bishop McManus said, explaining why the diocese did not name names. He added that the publication of such lists—which has become a routine matter in many US dioceses—“can be a cause for deep division among many members of our Church who see this as publicly branding as guilty those who never have been charged by law enforcement or had a chance to defend themselves in a court of law…” …

Continue reading >>>>