Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the health-check domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131
Eugenics Revived: Red States, Civil Libertarians Urge SCOTUS to Fix Precedent Behind COVID Mandates, by Greg Piper – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

Eugenics Revived: Red States, Civil Libertarians Urge SCOTUS to Fix Precedent Behind COVID Mandates, by Greg Piper

Today’s Feast Day: Presentation of the Lord

February 2, 2026

GET THE FACTS: Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide, and Palliative Care Are Not the Same, by Nancy Flanders

February 2, 2026

Covid mandates. Grok AI image

By Greg Piper, Just the News, February 1, 2026

Courts have been botching 1905 precedent upholding mandate for vaccine that actually stops transmission since Buck v. Bell, which upheld forced sterilization of “imbeciles,” and especially in COVID era, SCOTUS hears.

Whenever COVID-19 vaccine mandates were legally challenged, public entities were likely to invoke a 1905 Supreme Court precedent upholding a $5 fine on a Massachusetts man for violating a local smallpox vaccination ordinance. Invented a century earlier, the vaccine allegedly has a 95% effective rate against infection.

An advocacy group that fights “unwanted medical treatments” is asking the high court to take a fresh look at the case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, and how courts have interpreted it – extrapolating the holding far beyond the facts of the case – and getting an assist from several red states and a public interest law firm that seeks to rein in the administrative state. …

Continue reading >>>>>>>>>>>