Free Speech Depends On SCOTUS Rejecting The Government’s Censorship Excuses In Murthy v. Missouri, by Scott Street

The Catholic Answer to the Longing for ‘Wellness’, by Rebecca Wilson
March 14, 2024
The Bachall Isu—The Crozier of St. Patrick, by Phillip Campbell
March 15, 2024

Panorama of the west facade of United States Supreme Court Building at dusk in Washington, D.C., USA. 10 October 2011. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Joe Ravi. You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work ....

By Scott Street, The Federalist, March 15, 2024

Missouri v. Biden, or Murthy v. Missouri, is one of the most interesting cases in Supreme Court history and will hinge on three critical questions.

On July 4, 2023, Louisiana-based federal Judge Terry Doughty issued a historic decision in the censorship case then called Missouri v. Biden (the case was filed by two state attorneys general, including Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, who now sits in the U.S. Senate). The decisions made news not just for the result and the date it was issued, but for the importance Doughty showed to the underlying issue.

In fact, Doughty’s opinion echoed the lofty rhetoric of the great federal court decisions issued during the civil rights era. But the political dynamic had flipped. Instead of liberal federal judges siding with the federal government to strike down prejudiced state and local laws, as in the ’50s and ’60s, here we had a conservative judge siding with local officials and private citizens against a federal bureaucracy run by the Democrat Party. …