Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the health-check domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Leo XIV Contra Leo XIII, Michael Pakaluk – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

Leo XIV Contra Leo XIII, Michael Pakaluk

Founder’s Quote
October 23, 2025
Saint of the Day for October 24: St. Anthony Mary Claret
October 24, 2025

Two Seated Lions by Albrecht Dürer, 1521 [Kupferstichkabinett, Berlin]

By Michael Pakaluk,  The Catholic Thing, October 23, 2025

Michael Pakaluk, an Aristotle scholar and Ordinarius of the Pontifical Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas, is Professor of Political Economy in the Busch School of Business at the Catholic University of America. …

 

Pope Leo XIV took his name to signal his closeness to Leo XIII, and yet in his recent Apostolic Exhortation, Dilexi te, his statements sometimes seem at odds with his predecessor: on the root of social evils, the remediation of poverty, and private property.

For Leo XIV, the root of social ills is inequality.  Reaffirming Francis, he says: “I can only state once more that inequality ‘is the root of social ills.’” (n. 94)  But for Leo XIII, in his first encyclical, “On the Evils of Society” (Inscrutabili Dei consilio), the root of social ills is rather the rejection of Christianity by civil powers: “the source of [social] evils lies chiefly, We are convinced, in this, that the holy and venerable authority of the Church, which in God’s name rules mankind, upholding and defending all lawful authority, has been despised and set aside.” (n. 3)

The difference is not small, because if Christianity is not necessary, then, to eliminate social evils, it would suffice for civil powers to eradicate “structures of sin,” that is, structures of inequality. ….

Continue reading >>>>>>>>>>>>>