Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the health-check domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Liberty Counsel: Supreme Court Confirms Planned Parenthood Has No “Right” to Taxpayer Funding – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

Liberty Counsel: Supreme Court Confirms Planned Parenthood Has No “Right” to Taxpayer Funding

Gen Z: The Obergefell Generation, by Mary Frances Devlin

The Sacred Heart, in the West – and East, by Joseph R. Wood

Defund Planned Parenthood. Grok image.

By Liberty Counsel, (LifeNews), Jun 26, 2025

Washington, DC – In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic that South Carolina may exclude Planned Parenthood’s abortion facilities from its Medicaid program.

The decision, authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, decided that the federal Medicaid Act does not confer a right to choose any qualified medical provider and that South Carolina has the authority as a state to remove Planned Parenthood from its status as a qualified provider.

The main question in the case was whether individual Medicaid beneficiaries may sue state officials for denying patients coverage for their preferred medical provider under Medicaid’s qualified-provider provision. The case involved the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (§1983), which allows individuals to sue government officials for violating federal rights. ….

Continue reading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>