Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Rev. Peter M.J. Stravinskas: ‘Humanae Vitae’ at 55 – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

Rev. Peter M.J. Stravinskas: ‘Humanae Vitae’ at 55

Humanae Vitae Continues to Challenge Us To Love, Trust, and Sacrifice, by Carl E. Olson
July 25, 2023
House Member Urges Congress to ‘Criminalize’ CBDCs: ‘Tool for Coercion and Control’, by Emily Mangiaracina
July 26, 2023

November 22, 1968

Rev. Peter M.J. Stravinskas, The Catholic Thing, July 25, 2023

Father Peter Stravinskas holds doctorates in school administration and theology. He is the founding editor of The Catholic Response and publisher of Newman House Press. Most recently, he launched a graduate program in Catholic school administration through Pontifex University.

 

To hear some people talk, one would get the impression that the Church’s prohibition against artificial contraception, as reaffirmed in Paul VI’s encyclical Humanae Vitae (1968)  came out of the blue. In fact, there’s a strong and consistent ban on all such practices from the earliest days of the Church, right into the twentieth century, with statements to the same effect by Pope Paul VI’s three immediate predecessors, as well as Vatican II’s Gaudium et Spes. And all the Protestant Reformers held to this teaching, as did all their spiritual descendants, until the beginning of the twentieth century.

Pope John Paul II restated that case for the teaching of Humanae Vitae with patience and regularity.  Two statements of his, however, are particularly noteworthy.  In 1983, he declared: “Contraception is to be judged so profoundly unlawful as never to be, for any reason, justified.  To think or to say the contrary is equal to maintaining that in human life, situations may arise in which it is lawful not to recognize God as God.”  (L’Osservatore Romano, October 10, 1983) …