Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the mfn-opts domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
The Pelvic Divide: Anatomy, Ideology, and Pseudo-Science, by William Kilpatrick – Brown Pelican Society of Lousiana

The Pelvic Divide: Anatomy, Ideology, and Pseudo-Science, by William Kilpatrick

Vatican’s ‘Human Fraternity’ Day Fails to Mention Catholicism or Draw Crowds, by Michael Haynes

June 12, 2023

Louisiana Legislature Votes Against Required COVID Vaccines in Schools, by Sarah Merly

June 12, 2023

Closeup of a pelvic skeleton model. (Image: Otto Norin/Unsplash.com)

You can argue about whether God designed the pelvis this way or whether nature did, but it is an anatomical fact that children should know. It’s a fact that gives children an objective basis on which to discern who’s telling the truth about gender and who is not.

By William Kilpatrick, Catholic World Report, June 11, 2023

William Kilpatrick is the author of several books on religion and culture including Christianity, Islam, and Atheism: The Struggle for the Soul of the West (Ignatius Press) and What Catholics Need to Know About Islam (Sophia Institute Press). For more on his work and writings, visit his Turning Point Project website.

They called him “Elvis the Pelvis.” But except for his ability to swivel his pelvis in suggestive ways, there was nothing extraordinary about Elvis’s pelvis. An X-ray would have revealed that his pelvis had essentially the same structure as that of any other man.

By contrast, a comparison to an X-ray of a woman’s pelvis would reveal several significant differences. For example, the pelvic inlet on a male is narrower and heart shaped whereas for females it is open and circular. …

Continue reading >>>>

The Pelvic Divide: Anatomy, Ideology, and Pseudo-Science, by William Kilpatrick

Vatican’s ‘Human Fraternity’ Day Fails to Mention Catholicism or Draw Crowds, by Michael Haynes

Louisiana Legislature Votes Against Required COVID Vaccines in Schools, by Sarah Merly

You can argue about whether God designed the pelvis this way or whether nature did, but it is an anatomical fact that children should know. It’s a fact that gives children an objective basis on which to discern who’s telling the truth about gender and who is not.

By William Kilpatrick, Catholic World Report, June 11, 2023

They called him “Elvis the Pelvis.” But except for his ability to swivel his pelvis in suggestive ways, there was nothing extraordinary about Elvis’s pelvis. An X-ray would have revealed that his pelvis had essentially the same structure as that of any other man.

By contrast, a comparison to an X-ray of a woman’s pelvis would reveal several significant differences. For example, the pelvic inlet on a male is narrower and heart shaped whereas for females it is open and circular. …

Related posts

DeSantis Details Success of ‘Operation Tidal Wave’ Immigration Enforcement, by Craig Bannister

On Our Knees in Hope: The Conclave, the Papacy, and the Call to Prayerful Reverence, by Marcus Peter

RESOURCE: Diocese of Baton Rouge Offers The Church’s Teaching on IVF