By Shawn Fleetwood, The Federalist, August 08, 2025
Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. He previously served as a state content writer for Convention of States Action and his work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood
The ideal outcome in Louisiana v. Callais would be for SCOTUS to definitively declare that ‘race should never be a factor in redistricting,’ Hans von Spakovsky said.
While the battle between Republican- and Democrat-led states to redistrict ahead of the 2026 midterm continues to heat up, a case with major implications for the issue is quietly flying under the radar at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Late last week, the justices issued an order in a case known as Louisiana v. Callais. Set to be decided in the court’s 2025-2026 term, the matter revolves around a dispute involving Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the alleged prioritization of race when drafting Louisiana’s most recent congressional map.
In its order, the high court signaled that it would offer a definitive ruling on if the use of race when creating legislative districts violates the U.S. Constitution. More specifically, the justices instructed parties in the case to file supplemental briefs addressing the question of “[w]hether [Louisiana’s] intentional creation of a second majority-minority congressional district violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments …” ….
Continue reading >>>>>>>>>>>