Pro-Life
May 1, 2025
By Elise DeGeeter, LifeNews - CatholicVote joined a coalition of over 30 pro-life organizations Tuesday in urging the Trump administration to evaluate the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of the abortion drug mifepristone, immediately following the release of a new study revealing serious health risks... In a letter to President Donald Trump, the coalition praised Trump’s pro-life leadership and called for swift action to protect unborn children and their mothers. The letter argues that mifepristone—used in over 60% of US abortions—was irresponsibly approved in 2000 and continues to harm women.
April 29, 2025
By Emmy Griffin, Patriot Post - Last year, when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of chemical abortion pills crossing state lines, it opened a can of worms. More children die from abortion drugs than procedures, and mothers are left to face the consequences alone in the privacy of their own homes... This is a tragic situation, but women see chemical abortions as a low-risk way to get rid of an unwanted pregnancy. Part of this belief is based on sugar-coated claims from the Federal Drug Administration (FDA). But what if those claims are grossly incorrect and the risks are much greater?
April 29, 2025
By Katrina Trinko, The Daily Signal - Orchid, writes journalist Anna Louie Sussman, “screens embryos’ DNA for hundreds of conditions” and also “offer[s] what is known as polygenic screening, which gives parents what is essentially a risk profile on each embryo’s propensity for conditions, such as heart disease.”... Parents who opt to use Orchid get an extensive analysis of their embryos’ risk analysis for a variety of health conditions, including (but not limited to) autism, severe obesity, Alzheimer’s, inflammatory bowel disease, schizophrenia, diabetes, and breast cancer.
April 29, 2025
By John Stonestreet and Shane Morris, LifeNews - The recent debates over in vitro fertilization and surrogacy have taught us that most Christians aren’t prepared with answers for what’s ahead. And that means we will be in even more trouble with crazier and more dystopian-sounding technology, which is surely on the way. If we do not embrace a robust theology of what it means to be human that includes the design and inherent goodness of the body, we’ll have no idea whether to reject, redeem, or participate in the innovations.
Prev page
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158
Next pageNotice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /nas/content/live/brownpelican/wp-content/themes/betheme/sidebar-blog.php on line 43